BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30724479)

  • 1. A novel 3D printed cage with microporous structure and in vivo fusion function.
    Li P; Jiang W; Yan J; Hu K; Han Z; Wang B; Zhao Y; Cui G; Wang Z; Mao K; Wang Y; Cui F
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2019 Jul; 107(7):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30724479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion.
    Wu SH; Li Y; Zhang YQ; Li XK; Yuan CF; Hao YL; Zhang ZY; Guo Z
    Artif Organs; 2013 Dec; 37(12):E191-201. PubMed ID: 24147953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mesh Ti6Al4V Material Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) as a Promising Intervertebral Fusion Cage.
    Przekora A; Kazimierczak P; Wojcik M; Chodorski E; Kropiwnicki J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 35409345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model.
    Van Horn MR; Beard R; Wang W; Cunningham BW; Mullinix KP; Allall M; Bucklen BS
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 34029756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Williams GM; Unger J; Yee-Yanagishita C; Pelletier M; Walsh W; Peng Y; Jekir M
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e626-e634. PubMed ID: 35346883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced bioactivity of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants created by a high-temperature 3D printing process.
    Jung HD; Jang TS; Lee JE; Park SJ; Son Y; Park SH
    Biofabrication; 2019 Aug; 11(4):045014. PubMed ID: 31365916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.
    Tsai PI; Wu MH; Li YY; Lin TH; Tsai JSC; Huang HI; Lai HJ; Lee MH; Chen CY
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Feb; 22(1):171. PubMed ID: 33573634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    Fu J; Xiang Y; Ni M; Qu X; Zhou Y; Hao L; Zhang G; Chen J
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():4542302. PubMed ID: 33335923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants?
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Wang T; Lovric V; Morberg P; Mobbs RJ
    Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1885-1898. PubMed ID: 31255790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Christou C; He J; Vizesi F; Boden SD
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 29496625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensionally-Printed Polyether-Ether-Ketone Implant with a Cross-Linked Structure and Acid-Etched Microporous Surface Promotes Integration with Soft Tissue.
    Feng X; Yu H; Liu H; Yu X; Feng Z; Bai S; Zhao Y
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Aug; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 31382697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration.
    Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Safranski DL; Potter D; Sulchek T; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E417-E424. PubMed ID: 31703050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaction durability of porous polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK interbody fusion devices.
    Torstrick FB; Klosterhoff BS; Westerlund LE; Foley KT; Gochuico J; Lee CSD; Gall K; Safranski DL
    Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):857-865. PubMed ID: 29366985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bionic mechanical design and 3D printing of novel porous Ti6Al4V implants for biomedical applications.
    Peng WM; Liu YF; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Jun J; Baur DA; Xu JJ; Pan H; Xu X
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Aug.; 20(8):647-659. PubMed ID: 31273962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.
    Makino T; Takaneka S; Sakai Y; Yoshikawa H; Kaito T
    Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1303-1313. PubMed ID: 33389201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and fabrication of 3D-printed anatomically shaped lumbar cage for intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration treatment.
    Serra T; Capelli C; Toumpaniari R; Orriss IR; Leong JJ; Dalgarno K; Kalaskar DM
    Biofabrication; 2016 Jul; 8(3):035001. PubMed ID: 27431399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.