417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30724739)
1. Accuracy of Samsung Gear S Smartwatch for Activity Recognition: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Wanigatunga AA; Kheirkhahan M; Corbett DB; Mendoza T; Battula M; Ranka S; Fillingim RB; Manini TM; Rashidi P
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11270. PubMed ID: 30724739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods to estimate aspects of physical activity and sedentary behavior from high-frequency wrist accelerometer measurements.
Staudenmayer J; He S; Hickey A; Sasaki J; Freedson P
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2015 Aug; 119(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 26112238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying Multivariate Segmentation Methods to Human Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors' Data.
Li K; Habre R; Deng H; Urman R; Morrison J; Gilliland FD; Ambite JL; Stripelis D; Chiang YY; Lin Y; Bui AA; King C; Hosseini A; Vliet EV; Sarrafzadeh M; Eckel SP
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11201. PubMed ID: 30730297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Sensor Placement and Number on Physical Activity Recognition and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Older Adults: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Mardini MT; Nelson D; Albinali F; Ranka S; Rashidi P; Manini TM
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23681. PubMed ID: 33938809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A validation study of the Eurostat harmonised European time use study (HETUS) diary using wearable technology.
Harms T; Gershuny J; Doherty A; Thomas E; Milton K; Foster C
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jun; 19(Suppl 2):455. PubMed ID: 31159770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Raw and Count Data Comparability of Hip-Worn ActiGraph GT3X+ and Link Accelerometers.
Montoye AHK; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Pfeiffer KA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 May; 50(5):1103-1112. PubMed ID: 29283934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Validity and Generalizability of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Energy Expenditure: Validation Study.
O'Driscoll R; Turicchi J; Hopkins M; Duarte C; Horgan GW; Finlayson G; Stubbs RJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Aug; 9(8):e23938. PubMed ID: 34346890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Polar Active Watch and Waist- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers for Measuring Children's Physical Activity Levels during Unstructured Afterschool Programs.
Kim Y; Lochbaum M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30332785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning algorithms for activity recognition in ambulant children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Ahmadi M; O'Neil M; Fragala-Pinkham M; Lennon N; Trost S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 15(1):105. PubMed ID: 30442154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of smartwatch-based activity recognition models for rigging crew workers on cable logging operations.
Zimbelman EG; Keefe RF
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250624. PubMed ID: 33979355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+ and BodyMedia SenseWear Armband to estimate energy expenditure during physical activity and sport.
Gastin PB; Cayzer C; Dwyer D; Robertson S
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Mar; 21(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 28797831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of activity type in preschool children using machine learning techniques.
Hagenbuchner M; Cliff DP; Trost SG; Van Tuc N; Peoples GE
J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jul; 18(4):426-31. PubMed ID: 25088983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.
Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
