These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30725188)

  • 1. Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?
    Kauling AEC; Keul C; Erdelt K; Kühnisch J; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Oct; 23(10):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 30725188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data.
    Şeker E; Ozcelik TB; Rathi N; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26518986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Sigusch BW; Thompson GA; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 23228498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques.
    Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization.
    Freire Y; Gonzalo E; Lopez-Suarez C; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 33041277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM.
    Azar B; Eckert S; Kunkela J; Ingr T; Mounajjed R
    Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e001. PubMed ID: 29364328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study.
    Haddadi Y; Bahrami G; Isidor F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4043-4050. PubMed ID: 30796587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of marginal fit between press-fabricated and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns.
    Carlile RS; Owens WH; Greenwood WJ; Guevara PH
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 29303757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.