These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30725345)

  • 1. Can authorship bias be detected in meta-analysis?
    Abou-Setta AM; Rabbani R; Lix LM; Turgeon AF; Houston BL; Fergusson DA; Zarychanski R
    Can J Anaesth; 2019 Mar; 66(3):287-292. PubMed ID: 30725345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.
    Turner K; Carboni-Jiménez A; Benea C; Elder K; Levis B; Boruff J; Roseman M; Bero L; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Benedetti A; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e035633. PubMed ID: 32398334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasis.
    Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Ruano J; Gomez-Garcia F; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Maestre-Lopez B; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Velez Garcia-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175419. PubMed ID: 28403245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No consistent evidence of data availability bias existed in recent individual participant data meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Fujii T; Onishi A; Omae K; Luo Y; Imai H; Takahashi S; Itaya T; Pinson C; Nevitt SJ; Furukawa TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():107-114.e5. PubMed ID: 31654789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
    Colditz GA
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carotid endarterectomy with primary closure versus patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.
    Marsman MS; Wetterslev J; Jahrome AK; Gluud C; Moll FL; Karimi A; Keus F; Koning GG
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e026419. PubMed ID: 30948603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship.
    Pieper D; Waltering A; Holstiege J; Büchter RB
    Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):63. PubMed ID: 29690911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
    Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.
    Hansen JB; Juhl CB; Boutron I; Tugwell P; Ghogomu EAT; Pardo Pardo J; Rader T; Wells GA; Mayhew A; Maxwell L; Lund H; Christensen R;
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e005491. PubMed ID: 25280805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of behavioral interventions for substance use outcomes.
    Bo A; Hai AH; Chen DG; Hammock K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():20-27. PubMed ID: 34166755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations.
    Andersen MZ; Fonnes S; Andresen K; Rosenberg J
    J Evid Based Med; 2020 Aug; 13(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 32558203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Veroniki AA; Straus SE; Ashoor H; Stewart LA; Clarke M; Tricco AC
    Trials; 2016 Mar; 17(1):138. PubMed ID: 26975720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.
    Savović J; Jones H; Altman D; Harris R; Jűni P; Pildal J; Als-Nielsen B; Balk E; Gluud C; Gluud L; Ioannidis J; Schulz K; Beynon R; Welton N; Wood L; Moher D; Deeks J; Sterne J
    Health Technol Assess; 2012 Sep; 16(35):1-82. PubMed ID: 22989478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.