These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30726097)

  • 1. Comparison of Protein Quantification in a Complex Background by DIA and TMT Workflows with Fixed Instrument Time.
    Muntel J; Kirkpatrick J; Bruderer R; Huang T; Vitek O; Ori A; Reiter L
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 30726097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active Instrument Engagement Combined with a Real-Time Database Search for Improved Performance of Sample Multiplexing Workflows.
    Erickson BK; Mintseris J; Schweppe DK; Navarrete-Perea J; Erickson AR; Nusinow DP; Paulo JA; Gygi SP
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1299-1306. PubMed ID: 30658528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative accuracy in mass spectrometry based proteomics of complex samples: the impact of labeling and precursor interference.
    Sandberg A; Branca RM; Lehtiö J; Forshed J
    J Proteomics; 2014 Jan; 96():133-44. PubMed ID: 24211767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DirectMS1Quant: Ultrafast Quantitative Proteomics with MS/MS-Free Mass Spectrometry.
    Ivanov MV; Bubis JA; Gorshkov V; Tarasova IA; Levitsky LI; Solovyeva EM; Lipatova AV; Kjeldsen F; Gorshkov MV
    Anal Chem; 2022 Sep; 94(38):13068-13075. PubMed ID: 36094425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility, Specificity and Accuracy of Relative Quantification Using Spectral Library-based Data-independent Acquisition.
    Barkovits K; Pacharra S; Pfeiffer K; Steinbach S; Eisenacher M; Marcus K; Uszkoreit J
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):181-197. PubMed ID: 31699904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Mertins P; Tang LC; Krug K; Clark DJ; Gritsenko MA; Chen L; Clauser KR; Clauss TR; Shah P; Gillette MA; Petyuk VA; Thomas SN; Mani DR; Mundt F; Moore RJ; Hu Y; Zhao R; Schnaubelt M; Keshishian H; Monroe ME; Zhang Z; Udeshi ND; Mani D; Davies SR; Townsend RR; Chan DW; Smith RD; Zhang H; Liu T; Carr SA
    Nat Protoc; 2018 Jul; 13(7):1632-1661. PubMed ID: 29988108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MS3-IDQ: Utilizing MS3 Spectra beyond Quantification Yields Increased Coverage of the Phosphoproteome in Isobaric Tag Experiments.
    Berberich MJ; Paulo JA; Everley RA
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Apr; 17(4):1741-1747. PubMed ID: 29461835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extensive and Accurate Benchmarking of DIA Acquisition Methods and Software Tools Using a Complex Proteomic Standard.
    Gotti C; Roux-Dalvai F; Joly-Beauparlant C; Mangnier L; Leclercq M; Droit A
    J Proteome Res; 2021 Oct; 20(10):4801-4814. PubMed ID: 34472865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of label-free and label-based strategies for proteome analysis of hepatoma cell lines.
    Megger DA; Pott LL; Ahrens M; Padden J; Bracht T; Kuhlmann K; Eisenacher M; Meyer HE; Sitek B
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 May; 1844(5):967-76. PubMed ID: 23954498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical comparison of three MS-based approaches for quantitative proteomics analysis.
    Taverna D; Gaspari M
    J Mass Spectrom; 2021 Jan; 56(1):e4669. PubMed ID: 33128495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protocol for high-throughput semi-automated label-free- or TMT-based phosphoproteome profiling.
    Koenig C; Martinez-Val A; Naicker P; Stoychev S; Jordaan J; Olsen JV
    STAR Protoc; 2023 Sep; 4(3):102536. PubMed ID: 37659085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking quantitative label-free LC-MS data processing workflows using a complex spiked proteomic standard dataset.
    Ramus C; Hovasse A; Marcellin M; Hesse AM; Mouton-Barbosa E; Bouyssié D; Vaca S; Carapito C; Chaoui K; Bruley C; Garin J; Cianférani S; Ferro M; Van Dorssaeler A; Burlet-Schiltz O; Schaeffer C; Couté Y; Gonzalez de Peredo A
    J Proteomics; 2016 Jan; 132():51-62. PubMed ID: 26585461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Adaptive Pipeline To Maximize Isobaric Tagging Data in Large-Scale MS-Based Proteomics.
    Corthésy J; Theofilatos K; Mavroudi S; Macron C; Cominetti O; Remlawi M; Ferraro F; Núñez Galindo A; Kussmann M; Likothanassis S; Dayon L
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jun; 17(6):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 29695160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal analytical strategies for sensitive and quantitative phosphoproteomics using TMT-based multiplexing.
    Koenig C; Martinez-Val A; Franciosa G; Olsen JV
    Proteomics; 2022 Oct; 22(19-20):e2100245. PubMed ID: 35713889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-throughput, in-depth and estimated absolute quantification of plasma proteome using data-independent acquisition/mass spectrometry ("HIAP-DIA").
    Zhou Y; Tan Z; Xue P; Wang Y; Li X; Guan F
    Proteomics; 2021 Mar; 21(5):e2000264. PubMed ID: 33460299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.
    Stewart PA; Fang B; Slebos RJ; Zhang G; Borne AL; Fellows K; Teer JK; Chen YA; Welsh E; Eschrich SA; Haura EB; Koomen JM
    Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28195392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Workflow for Peptide-Level Quantitation from DIA/SWATH-MS Data.
    Gupta S; Röst H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2228():453-468. PubMed ID: 33950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data-Driven Tool for Cross-Run Ion Selection and Peak-Picking in Quantitative Proteomics with Data-Independent Acquisition LC-MS/MS.
    Yan B; Shi M; Cai S; Su Y; Chen R; Huang C; Chen DDY
    Anal Chem; 2023 Nov; 95(45):16558-16566. PubMed ID: 37906674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DeMix-Q: Quantification-Centered Data Processing Workflow.
    Zhang B; Käll L; Zubarev RA
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Apr; 15(4):1467-78. PubMed ID: 26729709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Label-free quantification in ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition proteomics.
    Distler U; Kuharev J; Navarro P; Tenzer S
    Nat Protoc; 2016 Apr; 11(4):795-812. PubMed ID: 27010757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.