These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30726770)
1. A screening approach to improve water management practices in undeveloped shale plays, with application to the transboundary Eagle Ford Formation in northeast Mexico. Hernández-Espriú A; Wolaver B; Arciniega-Esparza S; Scanlon BR; Young MH; Nicot JP; Macías-Medrano S; Breña-Naranjo JA J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 236():146-162. PubMed ID: 30726770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Projecting the Water Footprint Associated with Shale Resource Production: Eagle Ford Shale Case Study. Ikonnikova SA; Male F; Scanlon BR; Reedy RC; McDaid G Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 51(24):14453-14461. PubMed ID: 28841009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Improved Approach for Forecasting Ecological Impacts from Future Drilling in Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas Plays. Wolaver BD; Pierre JP; Ikonnikova SA; Andrews JR; McDaid G; Ryberg WA; Hibbitts TJ; Duran CM; Labay BJ; LaDuc TJ Environ Manage; 2018 Aug; 62(2):323-333. PubMed ID: 29654362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas extraction in China. Gao J; Zou C; Zhang X; Guo W; Yu R; Ni Y; Liu D; Kang L; Liu Y; Kondash A; Vengosh A Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 907():168135. PubMed ID: 37890628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial Risk Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing near Abandoned and Converted Oil and Gas Wells. Brownlow JW; Yelderman JC; James SC Ground Water; 2017 Mar; 55(2):268-280. PubMed ID: 27676227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Drinking water while fracking: now and in the future. Brantley SL Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 25713828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Hydraulic Fracturing on Overlying Aquifers in the Presence of Leaky Abandoned Wells. Brownlow JW; James SC; Yelderman JC Ground Water; 2016 Nov; 54(6):781-792. PubMed ID: 27144719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Will Water Issues Constrain Oil and Gas Production in the United States? Scanlon BR; Ikonnikova S; Yang Q; Reedy RC Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Mar; 54(6):3510-3519. PubMed ID: 32062972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impacts of Groundwater Pumping for Hydraulic Fracturing on Aquifers Overlying the Eagle Ford Shale. Brien JA; Obkirchner GE; Knappett PSK; Miller GR; Burnett D; Bhatia M Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):343-356. PubMed ID: 37507835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water use for Shale-gas production in Texas, U.S. Nicot JP; Scanlon BR Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3580-6. PubMed ID: 22385152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of water use for hydraulic fracturing for unconventional oil and gas versus conventional oil. Scanlon BR; Reedy RC; Nicot JP Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):12386-93. PubMed ID: 25233450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing cumulative water impacts from shale oil and gas production: Permian Basin case study. Scanlon BR; Reedy RC; Wolaver BD Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 811():152306. PubMed ID: 34906580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Vengosh A; Jackson RB; Warner N; Darrah TH; Kondash A Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(15):8334-48. PubMed ID: 24606408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shale oil production and groundwater: What can we learn from produced water data? Wang H PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250791. PubMed ID: 33930038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential water resource impacts of hydraulic fracturing from unconventional oil production in the Bakken shale. Shrestha N; Chilkoor G; Wilder J; Gadhamshetty V; Stone JJ Water Res; 2017 Jan; 108():1-24. PubMed ID: 27865434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic, social, and environmental evaluation of energy development in the Eagle Ford shale play. Mohtar RH; Shafiezadeh H; Blake J; Daher B Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():1601-1614. PubMed ID: 30235644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal variation in groundwater quality in the Permian Basin of Texas, a region of increasing unconventional oil and gas development. Hildenbrand ZL; Carlton DD; Fontenot BE; Meik JM; Walton JL; Thacker JB; Korlie S; Shelor CP; Kadjo AF; Clark A; Usenko S; Hamilton JS; Mach PM; Verbeck GF; Hudak P; Schug KA Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 562():906-913. PubMed ID: 27125684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Water Availability for Shale Gas Development in Sichuan Basin, China. Yu M; Weinthal E; Patiño-Echeverri D; Deshusses MA; Zou C; Ni Y; Vengosh A Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(6):2837-45. PubMed ID: 26881457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geochemical evidence for fugitive gas contamination and associated water quality changes in drinking-water wells from Parker County, Texas. Whyte CJ; Vengosh A; Warner NR; Jackson RB; Muehlenbachs K; Schwartz FW; Darrah TH Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 780():146555. PubMed ID: 34030322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fit-for-purpose treatment goals for produced waters in shale oil and gas fields. Conrad CL; Ben Yin Y; Hanna T; Atkinson AJ; Alvarez PJJ; Tekavec TN; Reynolds MA; Wong MS Water Res; 2020 Apr; 173():115467. PubMed ID: 32006805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]