These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30727021)

  • 1. Biomechanical Properties of Bioabsorbable Fixation for Osteochondral Shell Allografts.
    Thomas DM; Stannard JP; Pfeiffer FM; Cook JL
    J Knee Surg; 2020 Apr; 33(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 30727021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tibial fixation comparison of semitendinosus-bone composite allografts fixed with bioabsorbable screws and bone-patella tendon-bone grafts fixed with titanium screws.
    Kocabey Y; Klein S; Nyland J; Caborn D
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Mar; 12(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12845425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-tissue interference fixation: bioabsorbable screw versus metal screw.
    Brand JC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Johnson DL
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 16084287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of locked distal screws in retrograde nailing of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a laboratory study using cadaver femurs.
    Tejwani NC; Park S; Iesaka K; Kummer F
    J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Jul; 19(6):380-3. PubMed ID: 16003196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compression force and pullout strength comparison of bioabsorbable implants for osteochondral lesion fixation.
    Nuzzo MS; Posner M; Warme WJ; Medina F; Wicker R; Owens BD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Apr; 40(4):E61-3. PubMed ID: 21731933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The biomechanical properties of the feline femur.
    Gibson TW; Moens NM; Runciman RJ; Holmberg DL; Monteith GM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 18704236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
    Gupta A; Lattermann C; Busam M; Riff A; Bach BR; Wang VM
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanics of Ender rods, compression screw, and Zickel nail in the fixation of stable subtrochanteric femur osteotomies.
    Wainer RA; Wright PH; Gilbert JA; Taylor DF
    J Orthop Trauma; 1990; 4(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 2313430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.
    Cummins CA; Strickland S; Appleyard RC; Szomor ZL; Marshall J; Murrell GA
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 12627147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial fixation strength of two bioabsorbable pins for the fixation of hamstring grafts compared to interference screw fixation: single cycle and cyclic loading.
    Zantop T; Weimann A; Rümmler M; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W
    Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 15090379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyclic loading comparison between biodegradable interference screw fixation and biodegradable double cross-pin fixation of human bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts.
    Zantop T; Ruemmler M; Welbers B; Langer M; Weimann A; Petersen W
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 16084290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strength comparison of allogenic bone screws, bioabsorbable screws, and stainless steel screw fixation.
    Rano JA; Savoy-Moore RT; Fallat LM
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2002; 41(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 11858609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical testing of hamstring graft tibial tunnel fixation with bioabsorbable interference screws.
    Caborn DN; Nyland J; Selby J; Tetik O
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Nov; 19(9):991-6. PubMed ID: 14608319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical testing of bioabsorbable cannulated screws for slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation.
    Kroeber MW; Rovinsky D; Haskell A; Heilmann M; Llotz J; Otsuka N
    Orthopedics; 2002 Jun; 25(6):659-62; discussion 663. PubMed ID: 12083576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the compressive strength of various distal locking screw options in the treatment of tibia fractures with intramedullary nails.
    Xavier F; Goldwyn E; Hayes W; Carrer A; Elkhechen R; Berdichevsky M; Goldman A; Urban W; Saha S
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2011; 21(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 22150350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws. Influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, bone mineral density, and interference.
    Pena F; Grøntvedt T; Brown GA; Aune AK; Engebretsen L
    Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 8734884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis fixation: a cadaveric, simulated fracture stabilization study comparing bioabsorbable and metallic single screw fixation.
    Cox S; Mukherjee DP; Ogden AL; Mayuex RH; Sadasivan KK; Albright JA; Pietrzak WS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2005; 44(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 15768364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails.
    Erden T; Kapicioglu M; Demirtas A; Bilsel K; Akpinar F; Kuduz H
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 Nov; 53(6):490-496. PubMed ID: 31562026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of initial mechanical properties of 4 hamstring graft femoral fixation systems using nonpermanent hardware for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro animal study.
    Espejo-Baena A; Ezquerro F; de la Blanca AP; Serrano-Fernandez J; Nadal F; Montañez-Heredia E
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 16581457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.