These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30728647)

  • 1. Pilot Comparison of Adjustment Protocols of Personal Sound Amplification Products.
    Reed NS; Oliver A; Srinivasan NK; Lin FR; Korczak PA
    Semin Hear; 2019 Feb; 40(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 30728647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
    Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a New Evidence-Based Fitting Paradigm for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.
    Urbanski D; Hernandez H; Oleson J; Wu YH
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 30(1):43-66. PubMed ID: 33264578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications of direct-to-consumer hearing devices for adults with hearing loss: a review.
    Manchaiah V; Taylor B; Dockens AL; Tran NR; Lane K; Castle M; Grover V
    Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():859-871. PubMed ID: 28553093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Fit vs Audiologist-Fit Hearing Aids.
    De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38990557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Non-Self-Fitting Presets Compared to Prescription Hearing Aid Fittings and a Personal Sound Amplification Product.
    Venkitakrishnan S; Urbanski D; Wu YH
    Am J Audiol; 2023 Nov; 33(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 37956699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices for People with Hearing Loss: A Review.
    Tran NR; Manchaiah V
    J Audiol Otol; 2018 Oct; 22(4):178-188. PubMed ID: 30126260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musician and Nonmusician Hearing Aid Setting Preferences for Music and Speech Stimuli.
    D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH; Ricketts TA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 28(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 31091118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss II: Current Research on Affordable Hearing Technologies and Direct-to-Consumer Models.
    Jilla AM; Johnson CE; Danhauer JL
    Semin Hear; 2018 May; 39(2):146-157. PubMed ID: 29915452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
    Cho YS; Park SY; Seol HY; Lim JH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.