These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30728647)

  • 21. Applying the COM-B Model to Assess the Usability of Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Maidment DW; Ali YHK; Ferguson MA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):417-430. PubMed ID: 31044693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pilot Electroacoustic Analyses of a Sample of Direct-to-Consumer Amplification Products.
    Reed NS; Betz J; Lin FR; Mamo SK
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):804-808. PubMed ID: 28595255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
    Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CHENFIT-AMP, a nonlinear fitting and amplification strategy for cochlear hearing loss.
    Chen Z; Hu G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Nov; 60(11):3226-37. PubMed ID: 23846434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consumer and audiologist perspectives on hearables: a qualitative study.
    Bothe E; Bennett RJ; Ferguson MA
    Int J Audiol; 2024 May; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38690770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing Direct-to-Consumer Devices to Hearing Aids: Amplification Accuracy for Three Types of Hearing Loss.
    Sheffield SW; Jacobs M; Ellis C; Gerasimchik A
    Am J Audiol; 2023 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38052055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.
    Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W; Sharma A
    Front Aging; 2023; 4():1105879. PubMed ID: 37033402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, satisfaction with amplification in daily life, at 2 weeks post hearing aid fitting.
    McLeod B; Upfold L; Broadbent C
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 11527040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam: Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices.
    Maidment DW; Amlani AM
    Semin Hear; 2020 Nov; 41(4):254-265. PubMed ID: 33364675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gain adjustment at tinnitus pitch to manage both tinnitus and speech perception in noise.
    Shetty HN; Pottackal JM
    J Otol; 2019 Dec; 14(4):141-148. PubMed ID: 32742274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality.
    Johnson EE; Light KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):689-702. PubMed ID: 26333877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.