These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30728647)

  • 41. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. What's in a name? A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-medical amplification devices in adults with mild and moderate hearing losses.
    Maidment DW; Nakano K; Bennett RJ; Goodwin MV; Ferguson MA
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Feb; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38421265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices: Capabilities, Costs, and Cosmetics.
    Almufarrij I; Munro KJ; Dawes P; Stone MA; Dillon H
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519858301. PubMed ID: 31280709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the Self-Fitting Process with a Commercially Available Hearing Aid.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; McLelland M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 28240978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Audiologist Practices: Parent Hearing Aid Education and Support.
    Meibos A; Muñoz K; White K; Preston E; Pitt C; Twohig M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 27115242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A Personal Sound Amplification Product Compared to a Basic Hearing Aid for Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Choi JE; Kim J; Yoon SH; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    J Audiol Otol; 2020 Apr; 24(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 31842534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The selection and validation of output sound pressure level in multichannel hearing aids.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Cunningham DR
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):487-500. PubMed ID: 11770671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
    Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fitting Noise Management Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Verification Protocols.
    Scollie S; Levy C; Pourmand N; Abbasalipour P; Bagatto M; Richert F; Moodie S; Crukley J; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 26967364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prescribing and Verifying Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols and Outcomes from the Ontario Infant Hearing Program.
    Bagatto M; Moodie S; Brown C; Malandrino A; Richert F; Clench D; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):188-203. PubMed ID: 26967361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.
    Nelson PB; Perry TT; Gregan M; VanTasell D
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518798264. PubMed ID: 30191767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom.
    Anderson KL; Goldstein H
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2004 Apr; 35(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15191328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise.
    Svard I; Spens KE; Back L; Ahlner BH; Barrenas ML
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(29):12-23. PubMed ID: 17478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.