153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30729542)
1. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection in the prone position vs the classic lithotomy position: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Mesquita-Neto JWB; Mouzaihem H; Macedo FIB; Heilbrun LK; Weaver DW; Kim S
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 119(7):979-986. PubMed ID: 30729542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prone Compared With Lithotomy for Abdominoperineal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
McKechnie T; Lee Y; Springer JE; Doumouras AG; Hong D; Eskicioglu C
J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():469-480. PubMed ID: 31377486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prone Versus Supine Position in Abdominoperineal Resection: Outcomes in the Laparoscopic Era.
Ferrari C; Martinez Sanchez C; Bollo J; Hernandez P; Cambeiro L; Codina C; Targarona E
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 33646052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Qi XY; Cui M; Liu MX; Xu K; Tan F; Yao ZD; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang CH; Xing JD; Su XQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Oct; 132(20):2446-2456. PubMed ID: 31651517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominoperineal resection in the prone position: early outcomes at a tertiary institution in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Stevenson N; Lambrechts AVV; Forgan T
S Afr J Surg; 2020 Sep; 58(3):154-159. PubMed ID: 33231009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China.
Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X
Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local recurrence after prone vs supine abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Anderin C; Granath F; Martling A; Holm T
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 15(7):812-5. PubMed ID: 23350561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of technique on postoperative perineal wound infections in abdominoperineal resection.
Showalter SL; Kelz RR; Mahmoud NN
Am J Surg; 2013 Jul; 206(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 23611838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the lithotomy position: technique and early outcomes.
Kang CY; Carmichael JC; Friesen J; Stamos MJ; Mills S; Pigazzi A
Am Surg; 2012 Oct; 78(10):1033-7. PubMed ID: 23025934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.
Tayyab M; Sharma A; Ragg JL; Macdonald AW; Gunn J; Hartley JE; Monson JR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Mar; 55(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 22469799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is extralevator abdominoperineal resection necessary for low rectal carcinoma in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy era?
Güven HE; Aksel B
Acta Chir Belg; 2020 Oct; 120(5):334-340. PubMed ID: 31250735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prone or lithotomy positioning during an abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer results in comparable oncologic outcomes.
de Campos-Lobato LF; Stocchi L; Dietz DW; Lavery IC; Fazio VW; Kalady MF
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Aug; 54(8):939-46. PubMed ID: 21730781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term Outcomes of an Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection in the Prone Position Compared With a Conventional Abdominoperineal Resection for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: The Early Experience at a Single Institution.
Park S; Hur H; Min BS; Kim NK
Ann Coloproctol; 2016 Feb; 32(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 26962531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prone positioning reduces perineal infections when performing the miles procedure.
Dinaux AM; Amri R; Berger DL
Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 28610935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position.
Flor-Lorente B; Frasson M; Montilla E
Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92 Suppl 1():30-9. PubMed ID: 24842689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 12-year experience of the Trendelenburg perineal approach for abdominoperineal resection.
Toshniwal S; Perera M; Lloyd D; Nguyen H
ANZ J Surg; 2013 Nov; 83(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 23590533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transperineal abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position in male patients with low rectal cancer.
Uematsu D; Sugihara T
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):453-457. PubMed ID: 34655173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Establishment of a nomogram predicting risk factors of postoperative perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer].
Lu SQ; Chang XF; Yang XD; Yu DC; Huang QG; Wang F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 31054550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
Liu P; Bao H; Zhang X; Zhang J; Ma L; Wang Y; Li C; Wang Z; Gong P
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
