These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730087)

  • 1. Use of Implant-Supported Custom Milled Impression Copings to Capture Soft-Tissue Contours and Incisal Guidance.
    Bukhari SA; Proussaefs P; AlHelal A; Garbacea A; AlBader B; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):473-479. PubMed ID: 30730087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Novel Technique for Immediate Loading Single Root Form Implants With an Interim CAD/CAM Milled Screw-Retained Crown.
    Proussaefs P
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Aug; 42(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 26928766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 23684284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A technique for immediately restoring single dental implants with a CAD-CAM implant-supported crown milled from a poly(methyl methacrylate) block.
    Proussaefs P; AlHelal A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):339-344. PubMed ID: 28689913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The combination prosthesis: A digitally designed retrievable cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Proussaefs P; AlHelal A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):535-539. PubMed ID: 28927920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Technique for Duplicating the Contours of an Interim Implant Supported Crown to Fabricate a Custom Impression Coping and the Definitive Prosthesis.
    Vasconcellos F; Proussaefs P
    Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 25(6):861-865. PubMed ID: 27824718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Custom CAD-CAM healing abutment and impression coping milled from a poly(methyl methacrylate) block and bonded to a titanium insert.
    Proussaefs P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):657-662. PubMed ID: 27422231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technique for fabricating a custom gingival mask using a maxillary complete-arch implant-supported fixed interim prosthesis with an integrated verification cast.
    Esguerra RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 26384534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.
    Monaco C; Ragazzini N; Scheda L; Evangelisti E
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):383-385. PubMed ID: 29191608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precise Reproduction of Soft Tissue Structure around the Pontic Area Using Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing.
    Lee H; Paek J; Noh K; Kwon KR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):216-218. PubMed ID: 28833823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique to transfer the contours of an interim implant restoration to the definitive cast.
    Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 25799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simplified technique for recording an implant-supported ovate pontic site in the esthetic zone.
    Raigrodski AJ; Schwedhelm ER; Chen YW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 24210731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The CAD/CAM Compound Prosthesis: Digital Workflow for Fabricating Cement-Retained Zirconia Prosthesis Over Screw-Retained Milled Titanium Bars.
    Faeghinejad M; Proussaefs P; AlHelal A; Lozada J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 30543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fabrication of additively manufactured custom impression copings based on stock abutments.
    Abdel Raheem IM; Darwish RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 33386139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplified custom impression post for implant-supported restorations.
    Patras M; Martin W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26774317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a CAD-CAM poly(methyl methacrylate) interim prosthesis for direct intraoral splinting.
    Proussaefs P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):706-711. PubMed ID: 28526429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transferring subgingival contours around implants and the intaglio surface of the pontic to definitive digital casts by using an intraoral scanner: A technique.
    Sasada Y; Huynh-Ba G; Funakoshi E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 31202553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.