These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730087)

  • 21. Copy milling to duplicate the emergence profile for implant-supported restorations.
    Conejo J; Atria PJ; Hirata R; Blatz MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):671-674. PubMed ID: 31582167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Technique to Simultaneously Fabricate Multiple Custom Impression Posts for Implant-Supported Restorations in the Esthetic Zone.
    Hsieh YL; Aronovich S; Munz S; Liu F
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):339-342. PubMed ID: 30719764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital Custom Impression Technique to Record Emergence Profile and Fabrication of an Esthetic Implant Supported Restoration.
    Dhingra A; Taylor T; Flinton R
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):636-639. PubMed ID: 32406151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique.
    Kavadia V; Kourtis S; Zoidis P; Sarafianou A
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(3):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 31199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital workflow for the design and additively manufacture of a splinted framework and custom tray for the impression of multiple implants: A dental technique.
    Piedra Cascón W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):805-811. PubMed ID: 30067479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A digital workflow with computer-assisted implant planning for fabricating an impression splinting framework and custom tray for multiple implants.
    Li J; Chen Z; Dong B; Wang HL; Yu H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31780108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital Workflow With a Triple Scanning Technique for Implant Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Zone.
    Papaspyridakos P; Mariano A; De Souza A; Kotina E; Kudara Y; Kang K
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33001661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A technique for managing and accurate registration of periimplant soft tissues.
    Ntounis A; Petropoulou A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Oct; 104(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 20875533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):658-62. PubMed ID: 24836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An alternative conversion technique for fabricating an interim fixed implant-supported complete arch prosthesis.
    Hashemzadeh S; Yilmaz B; Zugaro F; McGlumphy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):647-651. PubMed ID: 27460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stereophotogrammetric impression making for polyoxymethylene, milled immediate partial fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Gómez-Polo C; Del Río J; Ortega R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):506-510. PubMed ID: 28709673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
    Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A three-appointment alternative treatment protocol for fabricating an implant-supported milled bar overdenture.
    Lin WS; Ozdemir E; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 22304740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accurate repositioning of an implant interim restoration into the definitive impression to obtain an exact reproduction of tissue contours in the soft tissue cast.
    Londono J; Blasi A; Silas J; Abreu A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):361-362. PubMed ID: 30093129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 23522368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Indirect implant-supported fixed provisional restoration in the esthetic zone: fabrication technique and treatment workflow.
    Shor A; Schuler R; Goto Y
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):82-95; discussion 96-7. PubMed ID: 18380837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate transfer of soft tissue morphology with interim prosthesis to definitive cast.
    Noh K; Kwon KR; Kim HS; Kim DS; Pae A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 24286639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.