157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730157)
1. Deliberate disguise in face identification.
Noyes E; Jenkins R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):280-290. PubMed ID: 30730157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeing through disguise: Getting to know you with a deep convolutional neural network.
Noyes E; Parde CJ; Colón YI; Hill MQ; Castillo CD; Jenkins R; O'Toole AJ
Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104611. PubMed ID: 33592392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognizing disguised faces: human and machine evaluation.
Dhamecha TI; Singh R; Vatsa M; Kumar A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e99212. PubMed ID: 25029188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dominance of texture over shape in facial identity processing is modulated by individual abilities.
Itz ML; Golle J; Luttmann S; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):369-396. PubMed ID: 27230305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Familiarity does not inhibit image-specific encoding of faces.
Dunn JD; Ritchie KL; Kemp RI; White D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):841-854. PubMed ID: 31135169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How familiarity warps representation in the face space.
Chauhan V; Kotlewska I; Tang S; Gobbini MI
J Vis; 2020 Jul; 20(7):18. PubMed ID: 32692827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal familiarity enhances sensitivity to horizontal structure during processing of face identity.
Pachai MV; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Schyns PG; Ramon M
J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):5. PubMed ID: 28593249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.
Bruce V; Henderson Z; Newman C; Burton AM
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11676099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New insights on real-world human face recognition.
Devue C; Wride A; Grimshaw GM
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jun; 148(6):994-1007. PubMed ID: 30247062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.
Balas B; Saville A
Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():228-236. PubMed ID: 28025050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the feature comparison strategy for forensic face identification.
Towler A; White D; Kemp RI
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Mar; 23(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 28045276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Being observed caused physiological stress leading to poorer face recognition.
Hills PJ; Dickinson D; Daniels LM; Boobyer CA; Burton R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():118-128. PubMed ID: 31054376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding an unfamiliar face in a line-up: Viewing multiple images of the target is beneficial on target-present trials but costly on target-absent trials.
Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):758-776. PubMed ID: 29658990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of disguise on identification decisions and confidence with simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Bertrand MI; Kalmet N; Melsom EI; Lindsay RCL
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 33444064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Face matching impairment in developmental prosopagnosia.
White D; Rivolta D; Burton AM; Al-Janabi S; Palermo R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Feb; 70(2):287-297. PubMed ID: 27042880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Caricaturing as a general method to improve poor face recognition: Evidence from low-resolution images, other-race faces, and older adults.
Dawel A; Wong TY; McMorrow J; Ivanovici C; He X; Barnes N; Irons J; Gradden T; Robbins R; Goodhew SC; Lane J; McKone E
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):256-279. PubMed ID: 30321022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
Weibert K; Andrews TJ
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in Photos of the Same Face Drives Improvements in Identity Verification.
Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
Perception; 2015; 44(11):1332-41. PubMed ID: 26562899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
