These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730190)
1. Comparability of self- and other-rated personality structure. Nuzum H; Ready RE; Clark LA Psychol Assess; 2019 Jun; 31(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 30730190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality for Youth (SNAP-Y): a new measure for assessing adolescent personality and personality pathology. Linde JA; Stringer D; Simms LJ; Clark LA Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):387-404. PubMed ID: 23794180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BSRF). Kotelnikova Y; Clark LA; Vernon PA; Hayden EP Assessment; 2015 Feb; 22(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 24847163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales. Samuel DB; Simms LJ; Clark LA; Livesley WJ; Widiger TA Personal Disord; 2010 Jan; 1(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 20458359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample. Wolf EJ; Harrington KM; Miller MW Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):911-24. PubMed ID: 21767029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrepancies in self- and informant-reports of personality pathology: Examining the DSM-5 Section III trait model. Carnovale M; Carlson EN; Quilty LC; Bagby RM Personal Disord; 2019 Sep; 10(5):456-467. PubMed ID: 31259602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP with the ICD-11, DSM-5, and FFM trait models. Crego C; Widiger TA Psychol Assess; 2020 Jan; 32(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31328932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format. Wetzel E; Frick S Psychol Assess; 2020 Mar; 32(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 31738070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: the ADP-IV. Schotte CK; de Doncker D; Vankerckhoven C; Vertommen H; Cosyns P Psychol Med; 1998 Sep; 28(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9794025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the temporal stability of self-report and interview assessed personality disorder. Samuel DB; Hopwood CJ; Ansell EB; Morey LC; Sanislow CA; Markowitz JC; Yen S; Shea MT; Skodol AE; Grilo CM J Abnorm Psychol; 2011 Aug; 120(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 21443287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2). Calabrese WR; Rudick MM; Simms LJ; Clark LA Psychol Assess; 2012 Sep; 24(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 22250598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial development of pathological personality trait domain measures using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Ruiz MA; Hopwood CJ; Edens JF; Morey LC; Cox J Personal Disord; 2018 Nov; 9(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 29939046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A psychometric evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in nonclinical and clinical German samples. Rek K; Thielmann I; Henkel M; Crawford M; Piccirilli L; Graff A; Mestel R; Zimmermann J Psychol Assess; 2020 Oct; 32(10):984-990. PubMed ID: 32730074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview]. Massoubre C; Bonnefond H; Grosselin A; Nelva A; Pellet J; Lang F Encephale; 2009 Dec; 35(6):544-53. PubMed ID: 20004285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The incremental validity of average state self-reports over global self-reports of personality. Finnigan KM; Vazire S J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):321-337. PubMed ID: 28277717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The self- and informant-personality inventories for ICD-11: Agreement, structure, and relations with health, social, and satisfaction variables in older adults. Oltmanns JR; Widiger TA Psychol Assess; 2021 Apr; 33(4):300-310. PubMed ID: 33779193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-Other Agreement in Personality Reports: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Self- and Informant-Report Means. Kim H; Di Domenico SI; Connelly BS Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 30481113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance. Carnovale M; Sellbom M; Bagby RM Psychol Assess; 2020 Jan; 32(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 31556679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the Five-Factor Model. Reynolds SK; Clark LA J Pers; 2001 Apr; 69(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 11339796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]