329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730229)
1. Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
Freckmann G; Link M; Kamecke U; Haug C; Baumgartner B; Weitgasser R
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 13(5):890-898. PubMed ID: 30730229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.
Zaharieva DP; Turksoy K; McGaugh SM; Pooni R; Vienneau T; Ly T; Riddell MC
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(6):313-321. PubMed ID: 31059282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy Between Abdominal and Upper Arm Insertion Sites.
Steineck IIK; Mahmoudi Z; Ranjan A; Schmidt S; Jørgensen JB; Nørgaard K
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 30994362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of three continuous glucose monitoring systems: comparison of six sensors per subject in parallel.
Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 23911165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
Laffel L
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
Link M; Kamecke U; Waldenmaier D; Pleus S; Garcia A; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 15(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 31847555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen
Hochfellner DA; Simic A; Taucher MT; Sailer LS; Kopanz J; Pöttler T; Mader JK
Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35200366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Longevity of an Implantable Continuous Glucose Sensor in the PRECISE Study: A 180-Day, Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Trial.
Kropff J; Choudhary P; Neupane S; Barnard K; Bain SC; Kapitza C; Forst T; Link M; Dehennis A; DeVries JH
Diabetes Care; 2017 Jan; 40(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27815290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II.
Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Chang AR; Levy CJ; Lam D; Denham DS; Atiee G; Bode BW; Walters SJ; Kelley L; Bailey TS
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 29381090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.
Garg SK; Smith J; Beatson C; Lopez-Baca B; Voelmle M; Gottlieb PA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Feb; 11(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 19243265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the performance of a novel system for continuous glucose monitoring.
Zschornack E; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Klötzer HM; Obermaier K; Schoemaker M; Strasser M; Frisch G; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 23911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.
Bailey TS; Chang A; Christiansen M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 25370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.
Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Interstitial Fluid Glucose Levels Obtained by Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Hemodialysis.
Yajima T; Takahashi H; Yasuda K
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 14(6):1088-1094. PubMed ID: 31625413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement Performance of Two Continuous Tissue Glucose Monitoring Systems Intended for Replacement of Blood Glucose Monitoring.
Freckmann G; Link M; Pleus S; Westhoff A; Kamecke U; Haug C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Aug; 20(8):541-549. PubMed ID: 30067410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
