284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730297)
1. Applying Multivariate Segmentation Methods to Human Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors' Data.
Li K; Habre R; Deng H; Urman R; Morrison J; Gilliland FD; Ambite JL; Stripelis D; Chiang YY; Lin Y; Bui AA; King C; Hosseini A; Vliet EV; Sarrafzadeh M; Eckel SP
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11201. PubMed ID: 30730297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Samsung Gear S Smartwatch for Activity Recognition: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Wanigatunga AA; Kheirkhahan M; Corbett DB; Mendoza T; Battula M; Ranka S; Fillingim RB; Manini TM; Rashidi P
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11270. PubMed ID: 30724739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of smartwatch-based activity recognition models for rigging crew workers on cable logging operations.
Zimbelman EG; Keefe RF
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250624. PubMed ID: 33979355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. w-HAR: An Activity Recognition Dataset and Framework Using Low-Power Wearable Devices.
Bhat G; Tran N; Shill H; Ogras UY
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32962046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Framework for Maternal Physical Activities and Health Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors.
Ullah F; Iqbal A; Iqbal S; Kwak D; Anwar H; Khan A; Ullah R; Siddique H; Kwak KS
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human activity recognition of children with wearable devices using LightGBM machine learning.
Csizmadia G; Liszkai-Peres K; Ferdinandy B; Miklósi Á; Konok V
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):5472. PubMed ID: 35361854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of sliding window variation in the performance of acceleration-based human activity recognition using deep learning models.
Jaén-Vargas M; Reyes Leiva KM; Fernandes F; Barroso Gonçalves S; Tavares Silva M; Lopes DS; Serrano Olmedo JJ
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2022; 8():e1052. PubMed ID: 36091986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ensemble machine learning model trained on a new synthesized dataset generalizes well for stress prediction using wearable devices.
Vos G; Trinh K; Sarnyai Z; Rahimi Azghadi M
J Biomed Inform; 2023 Dec; 148():104556. PubMed ID: 38048895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recognizing Physical Activities for Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Using Wearable Sensors.
Alhammad N; Al-Dossari H
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classifying running speed conditions using a single wearable sensor: Optimal segmentation and feature extraction methods.
Benson LC; Clermont CA; Osis ST; Kobsar D; Ferber R
J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 71():94-99. PubMed ID: 29454542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Wearable Inertial Sensor Approach for Locomotion and Localization Recognition on Physical Activity.
Khan D; Al Mudawi N; Abdelhaq M; Alazeb A; Alotaibi SS; Algarni A; Jalal A
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 38339452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wearable Sensors Reveal Menses-Driven Changes in Physiology and Enable Prediction of the Fertile Window: Observational Study.
Goodale BM; Shilaih M; Falco L; Dammeier F; Hamvas G; Leeners B
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e13404. PubMed ID: 30998226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Web-Based Upper Limb Home Rehabilitation System Using a Smartwatch and Machine Learning Model for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Prospective Comparative Study.
Chae SH; Kim Y; Lee KS; Park HS
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17216. PubMed ID: 32480361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical Activity Recognition Based on a Parallel Approach for an Ensemble of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers.
Abid M; Khabou A; Ouakrim Y; Watel H; Chemcki S; Mitiche A; Benazza-Benyahia A; Mezghani N
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depression Prediction by Using Ecological Momentary Assessment, Actiwatch Data, and Machine Learning: Observational Study on Older Adults Living Alone.
Kim H; Lee S; Lee S; Hong S; Kang H; Kim N
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14149. PubMed ID: 31621642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of handling breaks on estimation of heart rate responses to bouts of physical activity among young women: An accelerometer research issue.
Ayabe M; Kumahara H
Gait Posture; 2020 Sep; 81():1-6. PubMed ID: 32645577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Sensor Placement and Number on Physical Activity Recognition and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Older Adults: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Mardini MT; Nelson D; Albinali F; Ranka S; Rashidi P; Manini TM
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23681. PubMed ID: 33938809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Machine Learning Approach for Human Activity Recognition.
Papoutsis A; Botilias G; Karvelis P; Stylios C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Sep; 273():155-160. PubMed ID: 33087606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AccNet24: A deep learning framework for classifying 24-hour activity behaviours from wrist-worn accelerometer data under free-living environments.
Farrahi V; Muhammad U; Rostami M; Oussalah M
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Apr; 172():105004. PubMed ID: 36724729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
