393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730408)
1. Defining Prostate Cancer at Favorable Intermediate Risk: The Potential Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Genomic Tests.
Falagario UG; Beksac AT; Martini A; Cumarasamy S; Gupta A; Prasad S; Thulasidass H; Shah QN; Jayaratna I; Lewis S; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Tewari AK
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30730408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Provides Independent Information on Adverse Pathology in the Setting of Combined Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy.
Salmasi A; Said J; Shindel AW; Khoshnoodi P; Felker ER; Sisk AE; Grogan T; McCullough D; Bennett J; Bailey H; Lawrence HJ; Elashoff DA; Marks LS; Raman SS; Febbo PG; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2018 Sep; 200(3):564-572. PubMed ID: 29524506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.
Patel HD; Gupta M; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 29673946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Identify Aggressive Prostate Cancer at the Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Level.
Beksac AT; Cumarasamy S; Falagario U; Xu P; Takhar M; Alshalalfa M; Gupta A; Prasad S; Martini A; Thulasidass H; Rai R; Berger M; Hectors S; Jordan J; Davicioni E; Nair S; Haines K; Lewis S; Rastinehad A; Yadav K; Jayaratna I; Taouli B; Tewari A
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 30563651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol.
Lee DH; Koo KC; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 43(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 23580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer.
Rayn KN; Bloom JB; Gold SA; Hale GR; Baiocco JA; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Sabarwal VK; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 29852182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Decipher Test for predicting adverse pathology in candidates for prostate cancer active surveillance.
Kim HL; Li P; Huang HC; Deheshi S; Marti T; Knudsen B; Abou-Ouf H; Alam R; Lotan TL; Lam LLC; du Plessis M; Davicioni E; Fleshner N; Lane BR; Ross AE; Davis JW; Mohler JL; Trock BJ; Klein EA; Tosoian JJ; Hyndman ME; Bismar TA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Sep; 22(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 30542054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?
Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the Visibility of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impact Clinical Outcomes?
Deniffel D; Salinas E; Ientilucci M; Evans AJ; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Hamilton R; Roberts A; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA; Perlis N
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Clinical Utility of the Genomic Prostate Score in Men with Very Low to Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Gaffney C; Golan R; Cantu MD; Scognamiglio T; McCarthy H; Mosquera JM; McClure TD; Barbieri CE; Robinson BD; Khani F
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 30933552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiomics Features Measured with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Cherny M; Yadav KK; Beksaç AT; Thulasidass H; Lewis S; Davicioni E; Wang P; Tewari AK; Taouli B
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 30958743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decipher identifies men with otherwise clinically favorable-intermediate risk disease who may not be good candidates for active surveillance.
Herlemann A; Huang HC; Alam R; Tosoian JJ; Kim HL; Klein EA; Simko JP; Chan JM; Lane BR; Davis JW; Davicioni E; Feng FY; McCue P; Kim H; Den RB; Bismar TA; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 31455846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
