139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30730475)
1. Reflective Practice for Patient Benefit: An Analysis of Doctors' Appraisal Portfolios in Scotland.
Wakeling J; Holmes S; Boyd A; Tredinnick-Rowe J; Cameron N; Marshall M; Bryce M; Archer J
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2019; 39(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 30730475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
Wakeling J; Cameron N
Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.
Archer J; de Bere SR
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 24347152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
Rubin P
Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
Dawda P
Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors' views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom.
Archer J; Nunn S; Regan de Bere S
Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):994-1000. PubMed ID: 28756852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Reflection: a vital process for supporting the development of wisdom in doctors.
de Cossart L; Fish D; Hillman K
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2012 Dec; 18(6):712-7. PubMed ID: 23128525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.
Buckley S; Coleman J; Davison I; Khan KS; Zamora J; Malick S; Morley D; Pollard D; Ashcroft T; Popovic C; Sayers J
Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):282-98. PubMed ID: 19404891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.
Davies H; Khera N; Stroobant J
Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15665172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nursing portfolio study: the use in annual performance reviews.
Capan ML; Ambrose HL; Burkett M; Evangelista TR; Flook DM; Straka KL
J Nurses Prof Dev; 2013; 29(4):182-5. PubMed ID: 23877288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
Lewis M; Elwyn G; Wood F
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):454-60. PubMed ID: 12939890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
Finlay K; McLaren S
Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
