289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30732471)
41. Efficacy of RADPAD protective drape during coronary angiography.
Kherad B; Jerichow T; Blaschke F; Noutsias M; Pieske B; Tschöpe C; Krackhardt F
Herz; 2018 Jun; 43(4):310-314. PubMed ID: 28389764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. EFFICACY OF AN ADDITIONAL MOBILE LEADED SHIELD ON OPERATOR RADIATION DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY.
Luçon A; Ghrairi A; Lecoq G; Idali M; Huret B; Richard P; Morelle JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(4):389-394. PubMed ID: 26940441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A prospective case control comparison of the ZeroGravity system versus a standard lead apron as radiation protection strategy in neuroendovascular procedures.
Haussen DC; Van Der Bom IM; Nogueira RG
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Oct; 8(10):1052-5. PubMed ID: 26491039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Novel modification to leaded eyewear results in significant operator eye radiation dose reduction.
Kirkwood ML; Klein A; Guild J; Arbique G; Xi Y; Tsai S; Ramanan B; Timaran C
J Vasc Surg; 2020 Dec; 72(6):2139-2144. PubMed ID: 32276011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.
Kim KP; Miller DL; Balter S; Kleinerman RA; Linet MS; Kwon D; Simon SL
Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 18301095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effectiveness of Attaching a Lead Drape to a Radioprotective Shield for CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures.
Hasegawa T; Shimizu H; Asai T; Furuya Y; Hattori H; Inaba Y
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2024 Jun; 35(6):936-938. PubMed ID: 38789207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Optimizing Radiation Safety in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Practical Approach.
Christopoulos G; Makke L; Christakopoulos G; Kotsia A; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Haagen D; Kumbhani DJ; Chambers CE; Kapadia S; Mahmud E; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 26526181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Operators' radiation exposure reduction during cardiac catheterization using a removable shield.
Arrivi A; Pucci G; Vaudo G; Bier N; Bock C; Casavecchia M; Bazzucchi M; Dominici M
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):379-384. PubMed ID: 32034690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing CTO Operator Radiation.
McCutcheon K; Vanhaverbeke M; Dabin J; Pauwels R; Schoonjans W; Desmet W; Bennett J
J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():3146104. PubMed ID: 34987314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation.
Kado H; Patel AM; Suryadevara S; Zenni MM; Box LC; Angiolillo DJ; Bass TA; Guzman LA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 24954573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: the TALENT dosimetric substudy.
Sciahbasi A; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Burzotta F; Sarandrea A; Summaria F; Patrizi R; Rao S; Lioy E
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun; 4(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 21586692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reduction in operator radiation exposure during transradial catheterization and intervention using a simple lead drape.
Iqtidar AF; Jeon C; Rothman R; Snead R; Pyne CT
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 23453095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effectiveness of the implementation of a simple radiation reduction protocol in the catheterization laboratory.
Jurado-Román A; Sánchez-Pérez I; Lozano Ruíz-Poveda F; López-Lluva MT; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Moreno Arciniegas A; Agudo-Quilez P; Gil Agudo A
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 27085219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Optimizing Staff Dose in Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions by Comparing Clinical Data with Phantom Experiments.
Sailer AM; Paulis L; Vergoossen L; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 May; 30(5):701-708.e1. PubMed ID: 30952523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Minimizing exposure to radiation in invasive cardiology using modern dose-reduction technology: Evaluation of the real-life effects.
Faroux L; Blanpain T; Nazeyrollas P; Tassan-Mangina S; Herce B; Tourneux C; Metz D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1194-1199. PubMed ID: 28862392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach.
Marque N; Jégou A; Varenne O; Salengro E; Allouch P; Margot O; Spaulding C
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Nov; 102(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 19944390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes.
Brasselet C; Blanpain T; Tassan-Mangina S; Deschildre A; Duval S; Vitry F; Gaillot-Petit N; Clément JP; Metz D
Eur Heart J; 2008 Jan; 29(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 17999984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Efficacy of RADPAD® protection drape in reducing radiation exposure to the primary operator during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).
Sharma D; Ramsewak A; Manoharan G; Spence MS
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2016 Feb; 64(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 25900558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
