These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30732921)

  • 1. Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Meng Q; Wang X; Cai Y; Kong F; Buck AN; Yu G; Zheng N; Schnupp JWH
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 374():58-68. PubMed ID: 30732921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 11206166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
    Chen F; Zheng D; Tsao Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of the Mandarin speech perception test.
    Fu QJ; Zhu M; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):EL267-73. PubMed ID: 21682363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of naturally produced and synthesized Mandarin speech by cochlear implant listeners.
    Shi Y; Chen J; Gong Y; Chen B; Li Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2886. PubMed ID: 29857751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Chang YP; Lin CY; Chang RY
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():1-8. PubMed ID: 24576834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of spatial separation and noise type on sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Jiang Y; GalvinIII JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan YS; Chen B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 137(8):829-836. PubMed ID: 28296522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD; Liu S; Han N; Huang MW
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):70S-74S. PubMed ID: 17496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient Adaptive Speech Reception Threshold Measurements Using Stochastic Approximation Algorithms.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216520919199. PubMed ID: 32425135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
    Stuart A; Zhang J; Swink S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Reidy PF; Kristensen K; Winn MB; Litovsky RY; Edwards JR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 27556521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.