217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30734477)
1. Using the Braden subscales to assess risk of pressure injuries in adult patients: A retrospective case-control study.
Lim E; Mordiffi Z; Chew HSJ; Lopez V
Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):665-673. PubMed ID: 30734477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions.
Gadd MM; Morris SM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(6):535-8. PubMed ID: 25377103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midrange Braden Subscale Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients.
Alderden J; Cummins MR; Pepper GA; Whitney JD; Zhang Y; Butcher R; Thomas D
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 28671894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison Study of Braden Scale and Time-to-Erythema Measures in Long-term Care.
Yap TL; Rapp MP; Kennerly S; Cron SG; Bergstrom N
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2015; 42(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 26336042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Braden Scale risk assessments and pressure ulcer prevention planning: what's the connection?
Magnan MA; Maklebust J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):622-34. PubMed ID: 19920743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.
Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure ulcer incidence and Braden subscales: Retrospective cohort analysis in general wards of a Portuguese hospital.
Sardo PMG; Guedes JAD; Alvarelhão JJM; Machado PAP; Melo EMOP
J Tissue Viability; 2018 May; 27(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 29398293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.
Sardo P; Simões C; Alvarelhão J; Costa C; Simões CJ; Figueira J; Simões JL; Amado F; Amaro A; Melo E
J Clin Nurs; 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3165-76. PubMed ID: 26316350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining Pressure Injury Risk on Admission to Inpatient Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the FIM, Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale, and Braden Scale.
Flett HM; Delparte JJ; Scovil CY; Higgins J; Laramée MT; Burns AS
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 100(10):1881-1887. PubMed ID: 31054293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subscales, subscores, or summative score: evaluating the contribution of Braden Scale items for predicting pressure ulcer risk in older adults receiving home health care.
Bergquist S
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2001 Nov; 28(6):279-89. PubMed ID: 11707760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construct Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Assessment in Acute Care: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
Chen HL; Cao YJ; Shen WQ; Zhu B
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Feb; 63(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 28267683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries through Measure-vention.
Wyatt R
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2022 Jan; 35(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 34935721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Braden Scale cumulative score versus subscale scores: are we missing opportunities for pressure ulcer prevention?
Gadd MM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 24378697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records.
Jin Y; Piao J; Lee SM
Res Nurs Health; 2015 Apr; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 25556557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SIRA+P: Development and Testing.
Foster KL; Bergerhofer LD; Smith JB; Fix MM; Olney A; Sherman A
J Pediatr Nurs; 2017; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28094094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
