167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30735194)
1. Live Cell Analysis of Shear Stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using an Automated Higher-Throughput Microfluidic System.
Sutlief AL; Valquier-Flynn H; Wilson C; Perez M; Kleinschmidt H; Schofield BJ; Delmain E; Holmes AE; Wentworth CD
J Vis Exp; 2019 Jan; (143):. PubMed ID: 30735194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multichannel Microfluidic Platform for Temporal-Spatial Investigation of Niche Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli within a Dual-Species Biofilm.
Cheah H; Bae S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Jul; 89(7):e0065123. PubMed ID: 37382537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micropatterned biofilm formations by laminar flow-templating.
Aznaveh NB; Safdar M; Wolfaardt G; Greener J
Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2666-72. PubMed ID: 24722812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the rotating wall vessel technology to study the effect of shear stress on growth behaviour of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01.
Crabbé A; De Boever P; Van Houdt R; Moors H; Mergeay M; Cornelis P
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 10(8):2098-110. PubMed ID: 18430020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fluidic resistance control enables high-throughput establishment of mixed-species biofilms.
Hansen MF; Torp AM; Madsen JS; Røder HL; Burmølle M
Biotechniques; 2019 May; 66(5):235-239. PubMed ID: 31050304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physiology and genetic traits of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Herzberg M; Elimelech M
ISME J; 2008 Feb; 2(2):180-94. PubMed ID: 18049459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New device for high-throughput viability screening of flow biofilms.
Benoit MR; Conant CG; Ionescu-Zanetti C; Schwartz M; Matin A
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 76(13):4136-42. PubMed ID: 20435763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Shear Stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from the Cystic Fibrosis Lung.
Dingemans J; Monsieurs P; Yu SH; Crabbé A; Förstner KU; Malfroot A; Cornelis P; Van Houdt R
mBio; 2016 Aug; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 27486191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans Accumulate Greater Biomass in Dual-Species Biofilms under Flow.
Kasetty S; Mould DL; Hogan DA; Nadell CD
mSphere; 2021 Jun; 6(3):e0041621. PubMed ID: 34160236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress.
Mathias JD; Stoodley P
Biofouling; 2009 Nov; 25(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 20183128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-based 384-well high-throughput screening method for the discovery of skyllamycins A to C as biofilm inhibitors and inducers of biofilm detachment in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Navarro G; Cheng AT; Peach KC; Bray WM; Bernan VS; Yildiz FH; Linington RG
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014; 58(2):1092-9. PubMed ID: 24295976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofilm responses to smooth flow fields and chemical gradients in novel microfluidic flow cells.
Song JL; Au KH; Huynh KT; Packman AI
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2014 Mar; 111(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 24038055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of fluorescence foldscope as an effective tool for detection of biofilm formation in
Deshamukhya C; Das BJ; Chetri S; Paul D; Chanda DD; Banerjee T; Bhattacharjee A
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2020; 38(3 & 4):397-400. PubMed ID: 33154253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development: impact of mutations in genes involved in twitching motility, cell-to-cell signaling, and stationary-phase sigma factor expression.
Heydorn A; Ersbøll B; Kato J; Hentzer M; Parsek MR; Tolker-Nielsen T; Givskov M; Molin S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Apr; 68(4):2008-17. PubMed ID: 11916724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration and proliferation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 in multispecies biofilms.
Ghadakpour M; Bester E; Liss SN; Gardam M; Droppo I; Hota S; Wolfaardt GM
Microb Ecol; 2014 Jul; 68(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 24577741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling growth and quorum sensing in biofilms grown in microfluidic chambers.
Janakiraman V; Englert D; Jayaraman A; Baskaran H
Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Jun; 37(6):1206-16. PubMed ID: 19291402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of Lytic Phage Cocktails on
Kifelew LG; Warner MS; Morales S; Thomas N; Gordon DL; Mitchell JG; Speck PG
Viruses; 2020 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 32443619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fabrication of microbial biofilm arrays by geometric control of cell adhesion.
Eun YJ; Weibel DB
Langmuir; 2009 Apr; 25(8):4643-54. PubMed ID: 19215108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants.
Klausen M; Heydorn A; Ragas P; Lambertsen L; Aaes-Jørgensen A; Molin S; Tolker-Nielsen T
Mol Microbiol; 2003 Jun; 48(6):1511-24. PubMed ID: 12791135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of shear stress on growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antibiotic-induced morphological changes.
Fonseca AP; Sousa JC
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2007 Sep; 30(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17574822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
