These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30735908)

  • 21. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatialization in working memory is related to literacy and reading direction: Culture "literarily" directs our thoughts.
    Guida A; Megreya AM; Lavielle-Guida M; Noël Y; Mathy F; van Dijck JP; Abrahamse E
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():96-100. PubMed ID: 29486378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Further evidence for a spatial-numerical association in children before formal schooling.
    Ebersbach M; Luwel K; Verschaffel L
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 24351987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Culturally inconsistent spatial structure reduces learning.
    McCrink K; Shaki S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():20-6. PubMed ID: 27208418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Scozia G; D'Onofrio M; Raffa G; Nigro S; Arnaud CR; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Apr; 154():107773. PubMed ID: 33567295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters.
    Riello M; Rusconi E
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():372. PubMed ID: 22207856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane - a cross-cultural comparison.
    Göbel SM
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():228. PubMed ID: 25852583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Language influences number processing--a quadrilingual study.
    Moeller K; Shaki S; Göbel SM; Nuerk HC
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():150-5. PubMed ID: 25497523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Switching between Multiple Codes of SNARC-Like Associations: Two Conceptual Replication Attempts with Anodal tDCS in Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Design.
    Schroeder PA; Nuerk HC; Plewnia C
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():654. PubMed ID: 29217996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition.
    Shaki S; Fischer MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):804-9. PubMed ID: 22428673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
    Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Flexible mental processes in numerical size judgments: the case of Hebrew letters that are used to convey numbers.
    Razpurker-Apfeld I; Koriat A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16724772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mirror numbers activate quantity representations, but show no SNARC effect: A working memory explanation.
    Marzola G; Cohen DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):465-482. PubMed ID: 36939612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.
    Cipora K; Soltanlou M; Reips UD; Nuerk HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1676-1692. PubMed ID: 30805864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reading direction and spatial effects in parity and arithmetic tasks.
    Azhar M; Chen Y; Campbell JID
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2186-2196. PubMed ID: 32776258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The fractions SNARC revisited: Processing fractions on a consistent mental number line.
    Toomarian EY; Hubbard EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 28697687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.