236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30735990)
41. On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.
Lindsey BD; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1711-25. PubMed ID: 25766572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. High Frame Rate Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging for Slow Lymphatic Flow: Influence of Ultrasound Pressure and Flow Rate on Bubble Disruption and Image Persistence.
Zhu J; Lin S; Leow CH; Rowland EM; Riemer K; Harput S; Weinberg PD; Tang MX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2456-2470. PubMed ID: 31279503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations.
Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA
Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18977009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Using passive cavitation images to classify high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions.
Haworth KJ; Salgaonkar VA; Corregan NM; Holland CK; Mast TD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2420-34. PubMed ID: 26051309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances.
Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effects of ultrasound pulse parameters on cavitation properties of flowing microbubbles under physiologically relevant conditions.
Cheng M; Li F; Han T; Yu ACH; Qin P
Ultrason Sonochem; 2019 Apr; 52():512-521. PubMed ID: 30642801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of bubble shell nonlinearity on ultrasound nonlinear propagation through microbubble populations.
Tang MX; Loughran J; Stride E; Zhang D; Eckersley RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 21428471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Quantitative Frequency-Domain Passive Cavitation Imaging.
Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Rich KT; Holland CK; Mast TD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 27992331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fundamental study on subharmonic imaging by irradiation of amplitude-modulated ultrasound waves.
Maikusa N; Fukami T; Yuasa T; Tamura Y; Akatsuka T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):672-6. PubMed ID: 17614523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena.
Postema M; van Wamel A; Lancée CT; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 30(6):827-40. PubMed ID: 15219962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. High-Frequency Multipulse, Plane-Wave Acoustic Contrast Imaging.
Ketterling JA; Silverman RH
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 May; 67(5):934-942. PubMed ID: 31841408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Phase-dependent dual-frequency contrast imaging at sub-harmonic frequency.
Shen CC; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Feb; 58(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 21342823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.
Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Variations of bubble cavitation and temperature elevation during lesion formation by high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Zhou Y; Gao XW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1683-94. PubMed ID: 23927209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Non-linear Acoustic Emissions from Therapeutically Driven Contrast Agent Microbubbles.
Song JH; Moldovan A; Prentice P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):2188-2204. PubMed ID: 31085030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Low-amplitude non-linear volume vibrations of single microbubbles measured with an "acoustical camera".
Renaud G; Bosch JG; Van Der Steen AF; De Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1282-95. PubMed ID: 24613552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A computational framework for the multiphysics simulation of microbubble-mediated sonothrombolysis using a forward-viewing intravascular transducer.
Tan ZQ; Ooi EH; Chiew YS; Foo JJ; Ng EYK; Ooi ET
Ultrasonics; 2023 May; 131():106961. PubMed ID: 36812819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. High-speed observation of bubble cloud generation near a rigid wall by second-harmonic superimposed ultrasound.
Yoshizawa S; Yasuda J; Umemura S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1515-20. PubMed ID: 23927191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Passive Acoustic Mapping for Convex Arrays With the Helical Wave Spectrum Method.
Zhu H; Zeng Y; Cai X
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2024 May; 43(5):1923-1933. PubMed ID: 38198274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
