135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30736759)
1. Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy.
Procter AJ; Sun JY; Malcolm PN; Toms AP
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30736759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI-determined liver proton density fat fraction, with MRS validation: Comparison of regions of interest sampling methods in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Vu KN; Gilbert G; Chalut M; Chagnon M; Chartrand G; Tang A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1090-9. PubMed ID: 26536609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of reader agreement, correlation with liver biopsy, and time-burden sampling strategies for liver proton density fat fraction measured using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with obesity: a secondary cross-sectional study.
Cao D; Li M; Liu Y; Jin H; Yang D; Xu H; Lv H; Liu J; Zhang P; Zhang Z; Yang Z
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 May; 22(1):92. PubMed ID: 35581577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of region-of-interest sampling strategies for hepatic MRI proton density fat fraction quantification.
Hong CW; Wolfson T; Sy EZ; Schlein AN; Hooker JC; Fazeli Dehkordy S; Hamilton G; Reeder SB; Loomba R; Sirlin CB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):988-994. PubMed ID: 28842937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-reader agreement of magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction and its longitudinal change in a clinical trial of adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Hooker JC; Hamilton G; Park CC; Liao S; Wolfson T; Dehkordy SF; Hong CW; Mamidipalli A; Gamst A; Loomba R; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):482-492. PubMed ID: 30128694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of modified Dixon MRI techniques for hepatic fat quantification in hepatic disorders: validation with MRS and histology.
Kang BK; Kim M; Song SY; Jun DW; Jang K
Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20170378. PubMed ID: 29022777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three segments sampling strategy for the assessment of liver steatosis using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction.
Kim A; Kim M; Lee CM; Kang BK; Jun DW
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Feb; 159():110653. PubMed ID: 36563563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver.
Campo CA; Hernando D; Schubert T; Bookwalter CA; Pay AJV; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):592-603. PubMed ID: 28705058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective comparison of liver chemical shift-encoded PDFF sampling strategies in children and adolescents.
de Padua V Alves V; Dillman JR; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Oct; 47(10):3478-3484. PubMed ID: 35864263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hepatic fat quantification of magnetic resonance imaging whole-liver segmentation for assessing the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: comparison with a region of interest sampling method.
Zhang QH; Zhao Y; Tian SF; Xie LH; Chen LH; Chen AL; Wang N; Song QW; Zhang HN; Xie LZ; Shen ZW; Liu AL
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Jul; 11(7):2933-2942. PubMed ID: 34249624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the effect of region-of-interest methods using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging on staging hepatic fibrosis.
Ding Y; Rao S; Yang L; Chen C; Zeng M
Radiol Med; 2016 Nov; 121(11):821-827. PubMed ID: 27449761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interexamination repeatability and spatial heterogeneity of liver iron and fat quantification using MRI-based multistep adaptive fitting algorithm.
Sofue K; Mileto A; Dale BM; Zhong X; Bashir MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1281-90. PubMed ID: 25920074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and accuracy of various region-of-interest sampling strategies for hepatic MRI proton density fat fraction quantification.
Hong CW; Cui JY; Batakis D; Xu Y; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Schlein AN; Negrete LM; Middleton MS; Hamilton G; Loomba R; Schwimmer JB; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jul; 46(7):3105-3116. PubMed ID: 33609166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do regions of interest location and type influence liver stiffness measurement using magnetic resonance elastography?
Cogneau A; Cho H; Lucidarme O; Wagner M
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Jun; 100(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 30745249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of liver proton density fat fraction and changes in R 2* measurements induced by administering gadoxetic acid at 3T MRI.
Sofue K; Zhong X; Nickel MD; Dale BM; Bashir MR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Aug; 41(8):1555-64. PubMed ID: 27052456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of water-fat MRI and proton MRS in assessment of hepatic fat and the heterogeneous distribution of hepatic fat and iron in subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hui SCN; So HK; Chan DFY; Wong SKH; Yeung DKW; Ng EKW; Chu WCW
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():7-13. PubMed ID: 30292275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short- and midterm reproducibility of marrow fat measurements using mDixon imaging in healthy postmenopausal women.
Li G; Xu Z; Yuan W; Chang S; Chen Y; Calimente H; Hu J
Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1385-90. PubMed ID: 27502625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of PDFF estimation by magnitude-based and complex-based MRI in children with MR spectroscopy as a reference.
Haufe WM; Wolfson T; Hooker CA; Hooker JC; Covarrubias Y; Schlein AN; Hamilton G; Middleton MS; Angeles JE; Hernando D; Reeder SB; Schwimmer JB; Sirlin CB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1641-1647. PubMed ID: 28323377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of whole liver and small region-of-interest measurements of MRI liver R2* in children with iron overload.
McCarville MB; Hillenbrand CM; Loeffler RB; Smeltzer MP; Song R; Li CS; Hankins JS
Pediatr Radiol; 2010 Aug; 40(8):1360-7. PubMed ID: 20333511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of modified two-point dixon and chemical shift encoded MRI water-fat separation methods for fetal fat quantification.
Giza SA; Miller MR; Parthasarathy P; de Vrijer B; McKenzie CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jul; 48(1):274-282. PubMed ID: 29319918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
