These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30737020)
1. Measurement properties of quality assessment tools for studies of diagnostic accuracy. Kaizik MA; Garcia AN; Hancock MJ; Herbert RD Braz J Phys Ther; 2020; 24(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 30737020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment. Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The methodological quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies for musculoskeletal conditions can be improved. Henschke N; Keuerleber J; Ferreira M; Maher CG; Verhagen AP J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 24581295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies using psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS. Mann R; Hewitt CE; Gilbody SM Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 44(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 18836883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies of the performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis using QUADAS. Downs SH; More SJ; Goodchild AV; Whelan AO; Abernethy DA; Broughan JM; Cameron A; Cook AJ; Ricardo de la Rua-Domenech R; Greiner M; Gunn J; Nuñez-Garcia J; Rhodes S; Rolfe S; Sharp M; Upton P; Watson E; Welsh M; Woolliams JA; Clifton-Hadley RS; Parry JE Prev Vet Med; 2018 May; 153():108-116. PubMed ID: 28392087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Risk on bias assessment: (6) A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment on Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2)]. Qu YJ; Yang ZR; Sun F; Zhan SY Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 39(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 29699051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Whiting PF; Weswood ME; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PN; Kleijnen J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():9. PubMed ID: 16519814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of the QUADAS-2 in Assessing Risk of Bias in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Venazzi A; Swardfager W; Lam B; Siqueira JO; Herrmann N; Cogo-Moreira H Front Psychiatry; 2018; 9():221. PubMed ID: 29887812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. QUADAS and STARD: evaluating the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Oliveira MR; Gomes Ade C; Toscano CM Rev Saude Publica; 2011 Apr; 45(2):416-22. PubMed ID: 21412577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Wade R; Corbett M; Eastwood A Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26053845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire. La Touche R; Pardo-Montero J; Gil-Martínez A; Paris-Alemany A; Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S; Suárez-Falcón JC; Lara-Lara M; Fernández-Carnero J Pain Physician; 2014; 17(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 24452650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement properties of screening and diagnostic tools for autism spectrum adults of mean normal intelligence: A systematic review. Baghdadli A; Russet F; Mottron L Eur Psychiatry; 2017 Jul; 44():104-124. PubMed ID: 28641213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies. Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy for US. Roposch A; Moreau NM; Uleryk E; Doria AS Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):854-60. PubMed ID: 17053199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Psychometric Properties of Various Balance Assessment Tools in Persons With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Chiu AYY; Pang MYC J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Sep; 47(9):673-682. PubMed ID: 28704622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Martin JL; Williams KS; Abrams KR; Turner DA; Sutton AJ; Chapple C; Assassa RP; Shaw C; Cheater F Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(6):1-132, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16487456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic tools of intensive care unit acquired weakness: a systematic review]. Wu Y; Ding N; Jiang B; Zhang Z; Zhang C; Li B Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 30592950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]