268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30737566)
21. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging.
Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of pulmonary function using breathing chest radiography with a dynamic flat panel detector: primary results in pulmonary diseases.
Tanaka R; Sanada S; Okazaki N; Kobayashi T; Fujimura M; Yasui M; Matsui T; Nakayama K; Nanbu Y; Matsui O
Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 16971797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Study of X-ray Beam Quality and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Lung Nodules in Chest FPD Radiography: Monte Carlo Simulation Using Chest Model Phantom].
Oda N; Uehara S; Nakano T; Tabata Y; Mizuta M; Ideguchi T; Aoki T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(2):159-170. PubMed ID: 35185095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in Fuji Computed Radiography in regard to the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules].
Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Oguchi K; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Miyasaka T; Matsumoto T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Oct; 54(12):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9340603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Norrman E; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):62-8. PubMed ID: 19095816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):571-580. PubMed ID: 31385049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution.
Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Tezuka N; Nakano Y; Ikeda M; Kirino Y; Hashimoto K; Otani H; Murakami Y; Murata K
Radiat Med; 2008 Dec; 26(10):627-35. PubMed ID: 19132496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system.
Tanaka N; Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Akasaka T; Sasaki M; Ohki M; Morishita J
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jan; 6(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 23143711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
