268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30737566)
61. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Flat-panel detector computed tomography imaging: observer performance in detecting pulmonary nodules in comparison with conventional chest radiography and multidetector computed tomography.
Otani H; Nitta N; Ikeda M; Nagatani Y; Tanaka T; Kitahara H; Murakami Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
J Thorac Imaging; 2012 Jan; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21307781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Effect of tube voltage on digital chest radiograph for phantom and occupational exposed workers].
Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Duan JH; Yuan HS
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 31(9):671-4. PubMed ID: 24064123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Röhl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2004 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14734924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. A simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease detection study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg AM
Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 7558735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A flat-panel detector digital radiography and a storage phosphor computed radiography: screening for pneumoconioses.
Takashima Y; Suganuma N; Sakurazawa H; Itoh H; Hirano H; Shida H; Kusaka Y
J Occup Health; 2007 Jan; 49(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 17314465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in film-screen chest radiographs in regard to detection of simulated pulmonary nodules: comparison between film-screen combination and FCR].
Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Matsumoto T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1237-44. PubMed ID: 7610026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Dose reduction in computed tomography of the chest: image quality of iterative reconstructions at a 50% radiation dose compared to filtered back projection at a 100% radiation dose.
May MS; Eller A; Stahl C; Wuest W; Scharf M; Hammon M; Dankerl P; Schlechtweg PM; Allmendinger T; Sedlmair M; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 24477504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
