These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30737757)

  • 1. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.
    Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.
    Lim SJ; Carter YD; Njoroge JM; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Brain Lang; 2021 Oct; 221():104996. PubMed ID: 34358924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
    Kim S; Choi I; Schwalje AT; Kim K; Lee JH
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104393. PubMed ID: 32688132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
    Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct mechanisms for talker adaptation operate in parallel on different timescales.
    Choi JY; Kou RSN; Perrachione TK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 34731443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple talker processing in autistic adult listeners.
    Alispahic S; Pellicano E; Cutler A; Antoniou M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14698. PubMed ID: 38926416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103982. PubMed ID: 31229740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.
    Cummings SN; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2335-2359. PubMed ID: 36076119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive neurostimulation of left temporal lobe disrupts rapid talker adaptation in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Brain Lang; 2019 Sep; 196():104655. PubMed ID: 31310963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-Talker Speech Promotes Greater Knowledge-Based Spoken Mandarin Word Recognition in First and Second Language Listeners.
    Wiener S; Lee CY
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():214. PubMed ID: 32161560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.