BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30738295)

  • 1. What is the difference in driver's lateral control ability during naturalistic distracted driving and normal driving? A case study on a real highway.
    Wang C; Li Z; Fu R; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():98-105. PubMed ID: 30738295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distracted driving behavior in patients with insomnia.
    Zhang Q; Xu L; Yan Y; Li G; Qiao D; Tian J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106971. PubMed ID: 36657234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is improved lane keeping during cognitive load caused by increased physical arousal or gaze concentration toward the road center?
    Li P; Markkula G; Li Y; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():65-74. PubMed ID: 29656076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of common features of vehicle motion under drowsy/distracted driving: A case study in Wuhan, China.
    Chen Z; Wu C; Zhong M; Lyu N; Huang Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():251-9. PubMed ID: 25846494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drivers overtaking bicyclists-An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Feng F; Bao S; Hampshire RC; Delp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():98-109. PubMed ID: 29550613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of driver engagement in secondary tasks from observed naturalistic driving behavior.
    Ye M; Osman OA; Ishak S; Hashemi B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():385-391. PubMed ID: 28719829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A spectral power analysis of driving behavior changes during the transition from nondistraction to distraction.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 28534644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of driver cell phone use and their influence on driving performance: A naturalistic driving study.
    Wang X; Xu R; Asmelash A; Xing Y; Lee C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105845. PubMed ID: 33120181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interrelatedness of steering and lateral position parameters: Recommendations for the assessment of driving performance.
    Xu J; Fard M; Zhang N; Davy JL; Robinson SR
    J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():275-284. PubMed ID: 38485369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres.
    Happee R; Gold C; Radlmayr J; Hergeth S; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():211-222. PubMed ID: 28645018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the difference between perceived and actual risk of distracted driving? A field study on a real highway.
    Li Z; Wang C; Fu R; Sun Q; Zhang H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231151. PubMed ID: 32240274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of intersection crashes using naturalistic driving data through the lens of future I-ADAS.
    Galloway AJ; Bareiss M; Hasegawa T; Sherony R; Riexinger LE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):577-582. PubMed ID: 37534880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance.
    Ezzati Amini R; Al Haddad C; Batabyal D; Gkena I; De Vos B; Cuenen A; Brijs T; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107195. PubMed ID: 37441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does attention capacity moderate the effect of driver distraction in older drivers?
    Cuenen A; Jongen EM; Brijs T; Brijs K; Lutin M; Van Vlierden K; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():12-20. PubMed ID: 25667202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.