These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30738533)
61. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system. Tsalafoutas IA; Blastaris GA; Moutsatsos AS; Chios PS; Efstathopoulos EP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 18245792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations. Huda W; Scalzetti EM; Roskopf M Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):838-44. PubMed ID: 10841385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study. Schindera ST; Winklehner A; Alkadhi H; Goetti R; Fischer M; Gnannt R; Szucs-Farkas Z Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. An evaluation of in-plane shields during thoracic CT. Foley SJ; McEntee MF; Rainford LA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 23460031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Initial data from an experiment to implement a safe procedure to perform PA erect chest radiographs for COVID-19 patients with a mobile radiographic system in a "clean" zone of the hospital ward. Sng LH; Arlany L; Toh LC; Loo TY; Ilzam NS; Wong BSS; Lanca L Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 32517970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. An overview of doses to patients and irradiation conditions of diagnostic chest x ray examinations carried out in hospitals of the City of São Paulo, Brazil. Freitas MB; Yoshimura EM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 12593433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT DOSES FROM DIGITAL X-RAY CHEST SCREENING EXAMINATIONS. Vodovatov AV; Drozdov AA; Telnova AU; Bernhardsson C Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):232-9. PubMed ID: 26769906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study. Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on lung lesion conspicuity at MDCT: does one size fit all? Botelho MP; Agrawal R; Gonzalez-Guindalini FD; Hart EM; Patel SK; Töre HG; Yaghmai V Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e726-33. PubMed ID: 23928232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Behrman RH Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effective DQE (eDQE) for monoscopic and stereoscopic chest radiography imaging systems with the incorporation of anatomical noise. Boyce SJ; Choudhury KR; Samei E Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091916. PubMed ID: 24007167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study. De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation. Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head procedures. Staniszewska MA; Obrzut M; Rybka K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):326-31. PubMed ID: 15933131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of image quality in chest, hip and pelvis examinations between mobile equipment in nursing homes and static indirect radiography equipment in the hospital. Precht H; Hansen DL; Ring-Pedersen BM; Møller Hansen LF; Waaler D; Tingberg A; Midtgaard M; Jensen Ohlsen MG; Juhl Hankelbjerg ST; Ravn P; Jensen IE; Christensen JK; Blackburn Andersen PA Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e31-e37. PubMed ID: 32052778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]