377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30738589)
21. Time interval between rectal cancer resection and reintervention for anastomotic leakage and the impact of a defunctioning stoma: A Dutch population-based study.
Warps AK; Tollenaar RAEM; Tanis PJ; Dekker JWT;
Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2937-2947. PubMed ID: 34407272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The possibility of a transanal tube as an alternative to diverting stoma in terms of preventing severe postoperative anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.
Matsumoto T; Hamada M; Inada R; Yoshida T; Kobayashi T; Taniguchi N; Oishi M; Shigemitsu K; Sekimoto M
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2055-2064. PubMed ID: 32632501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors.
Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ikeda K; Ito M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 21(11):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31199545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A meta-analysis of the use of a transanal drainage tube to prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection by double-stapling technique for rectal cancer.
Shigeta K; Okabayashi K; Baba H; Hasegawa H; Tsuruta M; Yamafuji K; Kubochi K; Kitagawa Y
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):543-550. PubMed ID: 26091985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of transanal drainage tube in preventing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery without a defunctioning stoma: A meta-analysis.
Zhang YX; Jin T; Yang K
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e164-e172. PubMed ID: 36446701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transanal tube versus defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Yeow M; Soh S; Wong J; Koh FH; Syn N; Fearnhead NS; Wheeler J; Davies RJ; Chong CS; Simillis C
Br J Surg; 2022 Sep; 109(10):900-903. PubMed ID: 35640279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Tan WS; Tang CL; Shi L; Eu KW
Br J Surg; 2009 May; 96(5):462-72. PubMed ID: 19358171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Risk factors associated with non-closure of defunctioning stoma in patients with rectal cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis].
Alekseev MV; Shelygin YA; Rybakov EG
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2021; (2):40-47. PubMed ID: 33570353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Artus A; Tabchouri N; Iskander O; Michot N; Muller O; Giger-Pabst U; Bourlier P; Bourbao-Tournois C; Kraemer-Bucur A; Lecomte T; Salamé E; Ouaissi M
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):780. PubMed ID: 32819329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Defunctioning stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer does not impact anastomotic leakage: a national population-based cohort study.
Munshi E; Lydrup ML; Buchwald P
BMC Surg; 2023 Jun; 23(1):167. PubMed ID: 37340428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Necessity of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis].
Sun Y; Yang HJ; Lu YG; Liang TW
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 15(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 22539378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical-related risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Wang XT; Li L; Kong FB; Zhong XG; Mai W
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 50(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 31665375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Anastomotic leak is not associated with oncologic outcome in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Smith JD; Paty PB; Guillem JG; Temple LK; Weiser MR; Nash GM
Ann Surg; 2012 Dec; 256(6):1034-8. PubMed ID: 22584695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Intersphincteric Resection Without a Protective Defunctioning Stoma for Lower Rectal Cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Hasebe T; Saito T; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23 Suppl 2():S249-56. PubMed ID: 25743332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Role of transanal drainage tube in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer].
Zhao S; Tong W
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):714-7. PubMed ID: 27353109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk Factors Associated With Nonclosure of Defunctioning Stomas After Sphincter-Preserving Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhou X; Wang B; Li F; Wang J; Fu W
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 May; 60(5):544-554. PubMed ID: 28383455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diverting stomas reduce reoperation rates for anastomotic leak but not overall reoperation rates within 30 days after anterior rectal resection: a national cohort study.
Myrseth E; Nymo LS; Gjessing PF; Norderval S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 35739403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Defunctioning stomas may reduce chances of a stoma-free outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Holmgren K; Häggström J; Haapamäki MM; Matthiessen P; Rutegård J; Rutegård M
Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2859-2869. PubMed ID: 34310840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Current practice in Australia and New Zealand for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery with anastomosis: Analysis of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit.
Grupa VEM; Kroon HM; Ozmen I; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Sammour T
Colorectal Dis; 2021 Jun; 23(6):1421-1433. PubMed ID: 33650280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of a Transanal Drainage Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.
Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 May; 21(5):1441-1444. PubMed ID: 32458653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
