212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30738651)
21. Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans.
Swinnen AC; Öllers MC; Roijen E; Nijsten SM; Verhaegen F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):186-195. PubMed ID: 28291941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of dosimetric accuracy of acuros XB and analytical anisotropic algorithm against Monte Carlo technique.
Seniwal B; Bhatt CP; Fonseca TCF
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015035. PubMed ID: 33438623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Acuros (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) for dose calculation in treatment of oesophageal cancer: effects on modelling tumour control probability.
Padmanaban S; Warren S; Walsh A; Partridge M; Hawkins MA
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():286. PubMed ID: 25533761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 4D Monte Carlo dose calculations for pre-treatment quality assurance of VMAT SBRT: a phantom-based feasibility study.
Roberts NF; Williams M; Holloway L; Metcalfe P; Oborn BM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):21NT01. PubMed ID: 31470421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monte Carlo dose verification of VMAT treatment plans using Elekta Agility 160-leaf MLC.
Onizuka R; Araki F; Ohno T
Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():22-31. PubMed ID: 30278982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.
Pokhrel D; Sanford L; Halfman M; Molloy J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):55-63. PubMed ID: 30955251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Haga A; Magome T; Takenaka S; Imae T; Sakumi A; Nomoto A; Igaki H; Shiraishi K; Yamashita H; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():75. PubMed ID: 24625221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.
Yan C; Combine AG; Bednarz G; Lalonde RJ; Hu B; Dickens K; Wynn R; Pavord DC; Saiful Huq M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):195-209. PubMed ID: 28834214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetric accuracy and clinical quality of Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation algorithm for stereotactic and conventional lung volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.
Kroon PS; Hol S; Essers M
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():149. PubMed ID: 23800024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dosimetric comparison and evaluation of two computational algorithms in VMAT treatment plans.
Tsimpoukelli M; Patatoukas G; Chalkia M; Kollaros N; Kougioumtzopoulou A; Michaletou D; Kouloulias V; Platoni K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 24(9):e14051. PubMed ID: 37344987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric comparison of peripheral NSCLC SBRT using Acuros XB and AAA calculation algorithms.
Ong CCH; Ang KW; Soh RCX; Tin KM; Yap JHH; Lee JCL; Bragg CM
Med Dosim; 2017 Autumn; 42(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 28711478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for cranial radiosurgery using multiple noncoplanar arcs.
Audet C; Poffenbarger BA; Chang P; Jackson PS; Lundahl RE; Ryu SI; Ray GR
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):5863-72. PubMed ID: 22047350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Monte Carlo approach to validation of FFF VMAT treatment plans for the TrueBeam linac.
Gete E; Duzenli C; Milette MP; Mestrovic A; Hyde D; Bergman AM; Teke T
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021707. PubMed ID: 23387730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility of single-isocenter, multi-arc non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for multiple brain tumors using a linear accelerator with a 160-leaf multileaf collimator: a phantom study.
Iwai Y; Ozawa S; Ageishi T; Pellegrini R; Yoda K
J Radiat Res; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1015-20. PubMed ID: 24944266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of beam configuration with inaccurate or incomplete small field output factors on the accuracy of treatment planning dose calculation.
Sendani NG; Karimian A; Mahdavi SR; Jabbari I; Alaei P
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5273-5283. PubMed ID: 31465535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of small field output factors simulated uncertainties on the calculated dose in VMAT plans for brain metastases: a multicentre study.
Clemente S; Falco MD; Cagni E; Talamonti C; Boccia M; Gino E; Lorenzini E; Rosica F; Russo S; Alparone A; Zefiro D; Fiandra C
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20201354. PubMed ID: 33481637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT.
Kim KH; Chung JB; Suh TS; Kang SW; Kang SH; Eom KY; Song C; Kim IA; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207232. PubMed ID: 30419058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
