574 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30738819)
1. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
Jacobs JM; Salzberg CA
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of meshes and matrices in breast reconstruction.
Rolph R; Farhadi J
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2018 Aug; 79(8):454-459. PubMed ID: 30070945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Pompei S; Evangelidou D; Arelli F; Ferrante G
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
Heine N; Hoesl V; Seitz S; Prantl L; Brebant V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Maisel Lotan A; Ben Yehuda D; Allweis TM; Scheflan M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 31441807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Urban C; González E; Fornazari A; Berman G; Spautz C; Kuroda F; Furlan Anselmi K; Rabinovich I; Dória M; Nissen L; Schünemann E; Sobreiro B; Lima R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Device Assembly.
Sigalove S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S. PubMed ID: 29166346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Graziano FD; Lu J; Sbitany H
Clin Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 50(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 36813401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct to implant breast reconstruction with biological acellular dermal matrices.
Teoh V; Gui G
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2020 Mar; 81(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 32240004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Indications and Controversies for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Biological Meshes.
Zenn MR
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29080660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery.
Israeli R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):159S-172S. PubMed ID: 23096966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Sterile and Aseptic AlloDerm in 2039 Consecutive Cases.
Parikh RP; Brown GM; Sharma K; Yan Y; Myckatyn TM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):1401-1409. PubMed ID: 30204676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
