198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30739152)
1. Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities.
Robinson KF; Fuller AK; Stedman RC; Siemer WF; Decker DJ
Environ Manage; 2019 May; 63(5):565-573. PubMed ID: 30739152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy.
Marshall N; Adger N; Attwood S; Brown K; Crissman C; Cvitanovic C; De Young C; Gooch M; James C; Jessen S; Johnson D; Marshall P; Park S; Wachenfeld D; Wrigley D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0171950. PubMed ID: 28278238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.
Martin J; Runge MC; Nichols JD; Lubow BC; Kendall WL
Ecol Appl; 2009 Jul; 19(5):1079-90. PubMed ID: 19688917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management.
Groce JE; Farrelly MA; Jorgensen BS; Cook CN
Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29738621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of animal science in natural resource management: current decision making models and future needs.
Glimp HA; Havercamp MJ; Larson S
J Anim Sci; 1998 Apr; 76(4):948-53. PubMed ID: 9581915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.
Estévez RA; Anderson CB; Pizarro JC; Burgman MA
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 25155068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the Value of Information to improve conservation decision making.
Bolam FC; Grainger MJ; Mengersen KL; Stewart GB; Sutherland WJ; Runge MC; McGowan PJK
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Apr; 94(2):629-647. PubMed ID: 30280477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A typology of time-scale mismatches and behavioral interventions to diagnose and solve conservation problems.
Wilson RS; Hardisty DJ; Epanchin-Niell RS; Runge MC; Cottingham KL; Urban DL; Maguire LA; Hastings A; Mumby PJ; Peters DP
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 26390368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science-practice interface in ecology and conservation.
Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):449-461. PubMed ID: 30350891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive management of animal populations with significant unknowns and uncertainties: a case study.
Gerber BD; Kendall WL
Ecol Appl; 2018 Jul; 28(5):1325-1341. PubMed ID: 29696712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.
Bennett NJ; Roth R; Klain SC; Chan KM; Clark DA; Cullman G; Epstein G; Nelson MP; Stedman R; Teel TL; Thomas RE; Wyborn C; Curran D; Greenberg A; Sandlos J; Veríssimo D
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27334309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Everglades restoration science and decision-making in the face of climate change: a management perspective.
Estenoz S; Bush E
Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 55(4):876-83. PubMed ID: 25790777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving management of small natural features on private lands by negotiating the science-policy boundary for Maine vernal pools.
Calhoun AJ; Jansujwicz JS; Bell KP; Hunter ML
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(30):11002-6. PubMed ID: 25002496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.
Ohlson DW; Serveiss VB
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 17283600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From science to action: Principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making.
Cvitanovic C; McDonald J; Hobday AJ
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):864-874. PubMed ID: 27665124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of ecological-biological thresholds in conservation decision making.
Mavrommati G; Bithas K; Borsuk ME; Howarth RB
Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1173-1181. PubMed ID: 27112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing consequences of climate-driven species redistribution requires integration of ecology, conservation and social science.
Bonebrake TC; Brown CJ; Bell JD; Blanchard JL; Chauvenet A; Champion C; Chen IC; Clark TD; Colwell RK; Danielsen F; Dell AI; Donelson JM; Evengård B; Ferrier S; Frusher S; Garcia RA; Griffis RB; Hobday AJ; Jarzyna MA; Lee E; Lenoir J; Linnetved H; Martin VY; McCormack PC; McDonald J; McDonald-Madden E; Mitchell N; Mustonen T; Pandolfi JM; Pettorelli N; Possingham H; Pulsifer P; Reynolds M; Scheffers BR; Sorte CJB; Strugnell JM; Tuanmu MN; Twiname S; Vergés A; Villanueva C; Wapstra E; Wernberg T; Pecl GT
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 Feb; 93(1):284-305. PubMed ID: 28568902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management.
Virapongse A; Brooks S; Metcalf EC; Zedalis M; Gosz J; Kliskey A; Alessa L
J Environ Manage; 2016 Aug; 178():83-91. PubMed ID: 27131638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
