281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30739688)
1. Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency.
Witteman HO; Hendricks M; Straus S; Tannenbaum C
Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):531-540. PubMed ID: 30739688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.
Tamblyn R; Girard N; Qian CJ; Hanley J
CMAJ; 2018 Apr; 190(16):E489-E499. PubMed ID: 29685909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis.
Burns KEA; Straus SE; Liu K; Rizvi L; Guyatt G
PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002935. PubMed ID: 31613898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 10-year longitudinal evaluation of science policy interventions to promote sex and gender in health research.
Haverfield J; Tannenbaum C
Health Res Policy Syst; 2021 Jun; 19(1):94. PubMed ID: 34130706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An output evaluation of a health research foundation's enhanced grant review process for new investigators.
Hammond GW; Lê ML; Novotny T; Caligiuri SPB; Pierce GN; Wade J
Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Jun; 15(1):57. PubMed ID: 28629438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty.
Waisbren SE; Bowles H; Hasan T; Zou KH; Emans SJ; Goldberg C; Gould S; Levine D; Lieberman E; Loeken M; Longtine J; Nadelson C; Patenaude AF; Quinn D; Randolph AG; Solet JM; Ullrich N; Walensky R; Weitzman P; Christou H
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008 Mar; 17(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.
van der Lee R; Ellemers N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(40):12349-53. PubMed ID: 26392544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
Gordon R; Poulin BJ
Account Res; 2009; 16(1):13-40. PubMed ID: 19247851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of research investment on scientific productivity of junior researchers.
Farrokhyar F; Bianco D; Dao D; Ghert M; Andruszkiewicz N; Sussman J; Ginsberg JS
Transl Behav Med; 2016 Dec; 6(4):659-668. PubMed ID: 27351991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A decade of decline: Grant funding for researchers with disabilities 2008 to 2018.
Swenor BK; Munoz B; Meeks LM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228686. PubMed ID: 32126090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities.
Murray DL; Morris D; Lavoie C; Leavitt PR; MacIsaac H; Masson ME; Villard MA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155876. PubMed ID: 27258385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indeed: Cost of the NSERC science grant peer review system exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
Gordon R; Poulin BJ
Account Res; 2009 Jul; 16(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 20183164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".
Dickler HB; Fang D; Heinig SJ; Johnson E; Korn D
JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(22):2496-501. PubMed ID: 17565084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender differences in research grant applications for pediatric residents.
Gordon MB; Osganian SK; Emans SJ; Lovejoy FH
Pediatrics; 2009 Aug; 124(2):e355-61. PubMed ID: 19581267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes.
Nakamura RK; Mann LS; Lindner MD; Braithwaite J; Chen MC; Vancea A; Byrnes N; Durrant V; Reed B
Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34665132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.
Cheng MY; Sukhov A; Sultani H; Kim K; Maverakis E
JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Aug; 152(8):883-8. PubMed ID: 27191545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The status of women cognitive scientists in Canada: Insights from publicly available NSERC funding data.
Titone D; Tiv M; Pexman PM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Jun; 72(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 29902029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Male applicants are more likely to be awarded fellowships than female applicants: A case study of a Japanese national funding agency.
Kyogoku D; Wada Y
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0291372. PubMed ID: 37878541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
Berg JM
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports.
Severin A; Martins J; Heyard R; Delavy F; Jorstad A; Egger M
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035058. PubMed ID: 32819934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
