283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30739688)
21. The impact of gender on scientific writing: An observational study of grant proposals.
Franco MC; Rice DB; Schuch HS; Dellagostin OA; Cenci MS; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():37-43. PubMed ID: 33545271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
Roy HK
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process.
Morgan B; Yu LM; Solomon T; Ziebland S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230118. PubMed ID: 32163468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies.
Costello LC
Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 20520024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Health services and policy research in the first decade at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Tamblyn R; McMahon M; Girard N; Drake E; Nadigel J; Gaudreau K
CMAJ Open; 2016; 4(2):E213-21. PubMed ID: 27398366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Applying for, reviewing and funding public health research in Germany and beyond.
Gerhardus A; Becher H; Groenewegen P; Mansmann U; Meyer T; Pfaff H; Puhan M; Razum O; Rehfuess E; Sauerborn R; Strech D; Wissing F; Zeeb H; Hummers-Pradier E
Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 27297230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness.
Gallo SA; Schmaling KB; Thompson LA; Glisson SR
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Mar; 27(2):18. PubMed ID: 33733708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact?
Johnson J; Sharman Z; Vissandjée B; Stewart DE
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99900. PubMed ID: 24964040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gender, Race, and Grant Reviews: Translating and Responding to Research Feedback.
Biernat M; Carnes M; Filut A; Kaatz A
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Jan; 46(1):140-154. PubMed ID: 31088206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Canadian Institutes of Health Research support for population health intervention research in Canada.
Di Ruggiero E; Rose A; Gaudreau K
Can J Public Health; 2009; 100(1):Suppl I15-9. PubMed ID: 19263978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Doubts over evolution block funding by Canadian agency.
Hoag H
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?
Kaatz A; Lee YG; Potvien A; Magua W; Filut A; Bhattacharya A; Leatherberry R; Zhu X; Carnes M
Acad Med; 2016 Aug; 91(8):1080-8. PubMed ID: 27276003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
Guglielmi G
Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. NIH funding longevity by gender.
Hechtman LA; Moore NP; Schulkey CE; Miklos AC; Calcagno AM; Aragon R; Greenberg JH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(31):7943-7948. PubMed ID: 30012615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic analysis of global health research funding in Canada, 2000-2016.
Hoffman SJ; Gunn E; Rogers Van Katwyk S; Nixon S
Can J Public Health; 2020 Feb; 111(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 31696423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Funding for patient-oriented research. Critical strain on a fundamental linchpin.
Williams GH; Wara DW; Carbone P
JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 9218670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Trends in funding for research on pain: a report on the National Institutes Of Health grant awards over the years 2003 to 2007.
Bradshaw DH; Empy C; Davis P; Lipschitz D; Dalton P; Nakamura Y; Chapman CR
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1077-87, 1087.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19038770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems.
Hodgson C
J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1189-95. PubMed ID: 9393374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cutting random funding decisions.
Graves N; Barnett AG; Clarke P
Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7330):299. PubMed ID: 21248827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The art of obtaining grants.
Devine EB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Mar; 66(6):580-7. PubMed ID: 19265188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
