These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The bonding of glass-ionomer cements to dental amalgam. Aboush YE; Jenkins CB Br Dent J; 1989 Apr; 166(7):255-7. PubMed ID: 2650727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum bond strength of dental luting cement to amalgam alloy. Mojon P; Hawbolt EB; MacEntee MI; Belser UC J Dent Res; 1989 Nov; 68(11):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2685070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Amalgam. XI. Glass-ionomer as a possible substitute of amalgam: longevity]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Jan; 101(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11830988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials. Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A bond strength study of luted castable ceramic restorations. McInnes-Ledoux PM; Ledoux WR; Weinberg R J Dent Res; 1989 May; 68(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 2654232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of thermocycling on amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores luted to cast gold crowns. Acrcoria CJ; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL Dent Mater; 1988 Jun; 4(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 3077381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. Arcoria CJ; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL J Oral Rehabil; 1989 May; 16(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 2664111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Specific bonding technics]. Sorel O; Mano MC; Mehdi S Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 19552878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonding of a light-curing glass-ionomer cement to dental amalgam. Aboush YE; Elderton RJ Dent Mater; 1991 Apr; 7(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 1936641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. Fajen VB; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF; Angolkar PV Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Apr; 97(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 2181867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META. Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology. Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Glass ionomer as an alternative to amalgam]. Forsten L Tandlakartidningen; 1990 May; 82(9):484-7. PubMed ID: 2205014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Amalgam. X. Glass-ionomer cement: a biocompatible substitute for amalgam?]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Nov; 100(11):484-8. PubMed ID: 11822129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of the dentin bonding agents. Part II. A comparison of glass ionomer cement with dentin bonding agents. Leinfelder KF; Russell CM; Thornton RJ; Cowen RG; Walker CK J Ala Dent Assoc; 1986; 70(2):15-22. PubMed ID: 3519722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]