These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30740267)

  • 1. Portable Perimetry Using Eye-Tracking on a Tablet Computer-A Feasibility Assessment.
    Jones PR; Smith ND; Bi W; Crabb DP
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 8(1):17. PubMed ID: 30740267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Open-source Static Threshold Perimetry Test Using Remote Eye-tracking (Eyecatcher): Description, Validation, and Preliminary Normative Data.
    Jones PR
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jul; 9(8):18. PubMed ID: 32855865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using an open-source tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) as a rapid triage measure for glaucoma clinic waiting areas.
    Jones PR; Lindfield D; Crabb DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 105(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 32747334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months.
    Jones PR; Campbell P; Callaghan T; Jones L; Asfaw DS; Edgar DF; Crabb DP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 223():42-52. PubMed ID: 32882222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
    Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability.
    McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Tatham AJ; Agarwal PK; Murray IC; Fleck BW; Minns RA
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):4. PubMed ID: 28900577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.
    Kong YX; He M; Crowston JG; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 5(6):2. PubMed ID: 27847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GlauCUTU: Virtual Reality Visual Field Test.
    Kunumpol P; Lerthirunvibul N; Phienphanich P; Munthuli A; Tantisevi V; Manassakorn A; Chansangpetch S; Itthipanichpong R; Ratanawongphaibol K; Rojanapongpun P; Tantibundhit C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():7416-7421. PubMed ID: 34892811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
    Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Slowed Saccadic Reaction Times in Seemingly Normal Parts of Glaucomatous Visual Fields.
    Thepass G; Lemij HG; Vermeer KA; van der Steen J; Pel JJM
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():679297. PubMed ID: 34513866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability.
    Murray IC; Perperidis A; Cameron LA; McTrusty AD; Brash HM; Tatham AJ; Agarwal PK; Fleck BW; Minns RA
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):3. PubMed ID: 28900576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients Prefer a Virtual Reality Approach Over a Similarly Performing Screen-Based Approach for Continuous Oculomotor-Based Screening of Glaucomatous and Neuro-Ophthalmological Visual Field Defects.
    Soans RS; Renken RJ; John J; Bhongade A; Raj D; Saxena R; Tandon R; Gandhi TK; Cornelissen FW
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():745355. PubMed ID: 34690682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients' views and experiences.
    Jones L; Callaghan T; Campbell P; Jones PR; Taylor DJ; Asfaw DS; Edgar DF; Crabb DP
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e043130. PubMed ID: 33820785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.