BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30740950)

  • 1. Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology.
    Termrungruanglert W; Khemapech N; Tantitamit T; Havanond P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e17. PubMed ID: 30740950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Screening Strategies and Triage With Cytology or Dual Stain for Cervical Cancer.
    Tantitamit T; Khemapech N; Havanond P; Termrungruanglert W
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820922540. PubMed ID: 32372659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus 16/18 genotype triage in cervical cancer screening.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Goodman KA; Santas CC; Huh WK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 20713299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
    Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
    J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary HPV testing verification: A retrospective ad-hoc analysis of screening algorithms on women doubly tested for cytology and HPV.
    Tracht J; Wrenn A; Eltoum IE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Jul; 45(7):580-586. PubMed ID: 28436211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
    van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
    BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
    Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping.
    Trzeszcz M; Mazurec M; Jach R; Mazurec K; Kotkowska-Szeps I; Kania M; Wantuchowicz M; Wasowska J; Duczek-Polakiewicz M; Rozmus P; Streb J; Halon A
    J Med Virol; 2023 Nov; 95(11):e29271. PubMed ID: 38009626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation and budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening using cobas 4800 HPV screening technology in the public sector of South Africa.
    Dreyer G; Maske C; Stander M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221495. PubMed ID: 31509545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
    Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
    PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women.
    Zhao X; Wu Q; Wang X; Fu Y; Zhang X; Tian X; Cheng B; Lu B; Yu X; Lan S; Lu W; Ma D; Cheng X; Xie X
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1322-1327. PubMed ID: 29518562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus DNA testing and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening in a publicly financed health-care system.
    Chow IH; Tang CH; You SL; Liao CH; Chu TY; Chen CJ; Chen CA; Pwu RF
    Br J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 103(12):1773-82. PubMed ID: 21102588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.
    Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Moschaki V; Panteleris N; Agorastos T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(1):120-127. PubMed ID: 27126005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Mayrand MH; Santas CC; Goggin P
    Can J Public Health; 2010; 101(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 20737813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in a HPV-positive gynecologic outpatient population.
    Luttmer R; Dijkstra MG; Snijders PJ; Berkhof J; van Kemenade FJ; Rozendaal L; Helmerhorst TJ; Verheijen RH; Ter Harmsel WA; van Baal WM; Graziosi PG; Quint WG; Spruijt JW; van Dijken DK; Heideman DA; Meijer CJ
    Mod Pathol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):870-8. PubMed ID: 27150161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
    Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
    Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.