BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30740958)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery.
    Bogani G; Rossetti D; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Leone C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e27. PubMed ID: 30740958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introducing nerve-sparing approach during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for locally-advanced cervical cancer: A multi-institutional experience.
    Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Spinillo A; Ditto A; Bogliolo S; Casarin J; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Gardella B; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Ferrero S; Cromi A; Lorusso D; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2150-2156. PubMed ID: 28927778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
    Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
    Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating 3D laparoscopy for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer: a comparison with open surgery.
    Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Sabatucci I; Adorni M; Lorusso D; Ditto A
    Tumori; 2016 Aug; 102(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 27373783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy plus external beam radiotherapy: a propensity-matched comparison.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Uccella S; Donadello N; Ghezzi F
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 110(7):893-8. PubMed ID: 25132470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
    He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of laparoscopy in the modified nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer].
    Li B; Yao H; Zuo J; Yang Y; Wang W; Zhang G; Zhou Y; Wu L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 36(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 24685090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis.
    Di Donato V; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Falcone F; Petrillo M; Capobianco G; Calò F; D'Augè TG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Ervas E; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F; Sopracordevole F; Vizza E; Giannini A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():49-54. PubMed ID: 37149905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome.
    Lanowska M; Brink-Spalink V; Mangler M; Grittner U; von Tucher E; Schneider A; Köhler C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 24362556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Liu Z; Li X; Tao Y; Li W; Yang Y; Yao Y; Zhu T
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():54-8. PubMed ID: 26632655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
    Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.