These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741051)

  • 1. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
    Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol compared to intravaginal misoprostol-only for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yin J; Li Y; Chen Y; Wang C; Song X
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():76-84. PubMed ID: 36566685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
    Lajusticia H; Martínez-Domínguez SJ; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 29445926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.
    Nasioudis D; Kim SW; Schoen C; Levine LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 33345815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-balloon catheter with concomitant vaginal misoprostol is the most effective strategy for labor induction: a meta-review with network meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Lin L; Vilchez-Lagos G; Duncan J; Condon N; Wheatley J; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S696-S715. PubMed ID: 38462253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
    Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
    Appadurai U; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101157. PubMed ID: 37722505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Mast K; van der Velden A; Bloemenkamp KW; Mol BW
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2016 Oct; 71(10):620-630. PubMed ID: 27770132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.