207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741913)
1. Training of Speech Perception in Noise in Pre-Lingual Hearing Impaired Adults With Cochlear Implants Compared With Normal Hearing Adults.
Bugannim Y; Roth DA; Zechoval D; Kishon-Rabin L
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e316-e325. PubMed ID: 30741913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users-German version].
Weißgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
HNO; 2023 Aug; 71(8):487-493. PubMed ID: 37395783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users.
Weißgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
HNO; 2024 Jan; 72(Suppl 1):10-16. PubMed ID: 37552279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the Outcomes of a Personalized Versus Nonpersonalized Home-Based Auditory Training Program for Cochlear Implant Users.
Magits S; Boon E; De Meyere L; Dierckx A; Vermaete E; Francart T; Verhaert N; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):477-493. PubMed ID: 36534665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voice Discrimination in Quiet and in Background Noise by Simulated and Real Cochlear Implant Users.
Levin M; Zaltz Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 66(12):5169-5186. PubMed ID: 37992412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit.
Prejban DA; Hamzavi JS; Arnoldner C; Liepins R; Honeder C; Kaider A; Gstöttner W; Baumgartner WD; Riss D
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e803-e809. PubMed ID: 30199498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Directional Microphones in Bilateral/Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users-Impact of Spatial and Temporal Noise Characteristics.
Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e551-e557. PubMed ID: 29135876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
