These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741913)

  • 21. Audio-visual speech perception in noise: Implanted children and young adults versus normal hearing peers.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 92():146-150. PubMed ID: 28012517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech performance and training effects in the cochlear implant elderly.
    Schumann A; Hast A; Hoppe U
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19 Suppl 1():45-48. PubMed ID: 25733367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Sheft S; Cheng MY; Shafiro V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81. PubMed ID: 26134724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Test-Retest Reliability of the Coordinate Response Measure in Adults with Normal Hearing or Cochlear Implants.
    Saleh SM; Saeed SR; Vickers D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 36812898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception of speech by prelingual pre-adolescent and adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Shpak T; Koren L; Tzach N; Most T; Luntz M
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Nov; 48(11):775-83. PubMed ID: 19951145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptation of scoring methods for testing cochlear implant users using the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Keung SK
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 23632972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term speech perception and morphosyntactic outcomes in adolescents and young adults implanted in childhood.
    Mancini P; Nicastri M; Giallini I; Odabaşi Y; Greco A; Dincer D'Alessandro H; Portanova G; Mariani L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Apr; 167():111514. PubMed ID: 36947998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Polterauer D; Keller S; Hemmert W
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 26865377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2673-2680. PubMed ID: 31177325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Eichenauer A; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014118. PubMed ID: 34028332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Kuvadia S; Gygi B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19. PubMed ID: 25633579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.