These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741913)
41. The role of speech rate for Italian-speaking cochlear implant users: insights for everyday speech perception. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Boyle PJ; Ballantyne D; De Vincentiis M; Mancini P Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):851-857. PubMed ID: 30178699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Recognition and Comprehension of "Narrow Focus" by Young Adults With Prelingual Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants. Segal O; Kishon-Rabin L J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3609-3624. PubMed ID: 29121171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients. Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1361-5. PubMed ID: 22539093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants. Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Monosyllable speech perception of Japanese hearing aid users with prelingual hearing loss: implications for surgical indication of cochlear implant. Fukuda S; Fukushima K; Toida N; Tsukamura K; Maeda Y; Kibayashi N; Nagayasu R; Orita Y; Kasai N; Kataoka Y; Nishizaki K Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Oct; 67(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 14550959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life. Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of spatial separation and noise type on sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. Liu YW; Tao DD; Jiang Y; GalvinIII JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan YS; Chen B Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 137(8):829-836. PubMed ID: 28296522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of technological advances on cochlear implant performance in adults. Lenarz M; Joseph G; Sönmez H; Büchner A; Lenarz T Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2634-40. PubMed ID: 22109764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Effect of Age, Type of Noise, and Cochlear Implants on Adaptive Sentence-in-Noise Task. Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L J Clin Med; 2022 Oct; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36233739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing. Yang HI; Zeng FG Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]