221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741914)
1. Individual Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation Using the Concept of Partial Insertion.
Lenarz T; Timm ME; Salcher R; Büchner A
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e326-e335. PubMed ID: 30741914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial Operative Experience and Short-term Hearing Preservation Results With a Mid-scala Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.
Svrakic M; Roland JT; McMenomey SO; Svirsky MA
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Dec; 37(10):1549-1554. PubMed ID: 27755356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.
James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.
O'Connell BP; Hunter JB; Haynes DS; Holder JT; Dedmon MM; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2352-2357. PubMed ID: 28304096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Using the Underwater Technique for Preserving Residual Hearing.
Anagiotos A; Beutner D; Gostian AO; Schwarz D; Luers JC; Hüttenbrink KB
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 26945314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Kay-Rivest E; Winchester A; McMenomey SO; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Friedmann DR
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):566-571. PubMed ID: 36534657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode.
Iso-Mustajärvi M; Sipari S; Löppönen H; Dietz A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):367-375. PubMed ID: 31673779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review.
Jayawardena J; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan G
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 22699985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
