221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741914)
41. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preserved low-frequency hearing following 20-mm cochlear implantation.
Brown KD; Melton MF; Shonfield H; Kraskin M; Wolf J
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 25569364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. ACEMg-mediated hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients receiving different electrode lengths (PROHEARING): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Scheper V; Leifholz M; von der Leyen H; Keller M; Denkena U; Koch A; Karch A; Miller J; Lenarz T
Trials; 2016 Aug; 17():394. PubMed ID: 27502589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Electroacoustic Stimulation Rehabilitation in Children With Limited Low-Frequency Hearing.
Nam GS; Song MH; Choi JY; Jung J
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):e894-e900. PubMed ID: 31498289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.
Campbell L; Kaicer A; Sly D; Iseli C; Wei B; Briggs R; O'Leary S
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 26859542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Nix EP; Thompson NJ; Brown KD; Dedmon MM; Selleck AM; Overton AB; Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec; 44(10):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 37758328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma.
Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S
HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(Suppl 2):56-62. PubMed ID: 30132125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Hearing Preservation With a New Atraumatic Lateral Wall Electrode.
Lenarz T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Timm M; Salcher R
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Sep; 41(8):e993-e1003. PubMed ID: 32569147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Surgical approach for complete cochlear coverage in EAS-patients after residual hearing loss.
Weiss NM; Dhanasingh A; Schraven SP; Schulze M; Langner S; Mlynski R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223121. PubMed ID: 31557251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Electro-natural Stimulation (ENS) in Partial Deafness Treatment: Pediatric Case Series.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Dziendziel B; Skarzynski PH
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 30570603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes.
Prentiss S; Sykes K; Staecker H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 20211124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Computed Tomography Estimation of Cochlear Duct Length Can Predict Full Insertion in Cochlear Implantation.
Johnston JD; Scoffings D; Chung M; Baguley D; Donnelly NP; Axon PR; Gray RF; Tysome JR
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 26837001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Acceptance and Benefit of Electroacoustic Stimulation in Children.
Spitzer ER; Kay-Rivest E; Waltzman SB; O'Brien-Russo CA; Santacatterina M; Roland JT; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):453-461. PubMed ID: 37167445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries.
Usami S; Moteki H; Tsukada K; Miyagawa M; Nishio SY; Takumi Y; Iwasaki S; Kumakawa K; Naito Y; Takahashi H; Kanda Y; Tono T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):717-27. PubMed ID: 24834939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Young age is a positive prognostic factor for residual hearing preservation in conventional cochlear implantation.
Anagiotos A; Hamdan N; Lang-Roth R; Gostian AO; Lüers JC; Hüttenbrink KB; Beutner D
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25251301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function.
Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Hopp E; Bunne M; Silvola JT; Jablonski GE
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e129-37. PubMed ID: 26524566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation.
Guimarães AC; Carvalho GM; Duarte AS; Bianchini WA; Sarasty AB; Gregorio MF; Zernotti ME; Sartorato EL; Castilho AM
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25649137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
