336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30741997)
1. Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data.
Kishikawa T; Momozawa Y; Ozeki T; Mushiroda T; Inohara H; Kamatani Y; Kubo M; Okada Y
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30741997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative investigation of single nucleotide variant calling for a personal non-Caucasian sequencing sample.
Park H; Gim J
Genes Genomics; 2023 Dec; 45(12):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 37651066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs.
Jiang Y; Jiang Y; Wang S; Zhang Q; Ding X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):556. PubMed ID: 31703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of whole-genome (13X) and capture (87X) resequencing methods for SNP and genotype callings.
Roux PF; Marthey S; Djari A; Moroldo M; Esquerré D; Estellé J; Klopp C; Lagarrigue S; Demeure O
Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 25515399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical design of a variant quality control pipeline for whole genome sequencing data using replicate discordance.
Adelson RP; Renton AE; Li W; Barzilai N; Atzmon G; Goate AM; Davies P; Freudenberg-Hua Y
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16156. PubMed ID: 31695094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of variant calling tools for large plant genome re-sequencing.
Yao Z; You FM; N'Diaye A; Knox RE; McCartney C; Hiebert CW; Pozniak C; Xu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):360. PubMed ID: 32807073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing of four Chinese crested dogs for variant detection using the ion proton system.
Viluma A; Sayyab S; Mikko S; Andersson G; Bergström TF
Canine Genet Epidemiol; 2015; 2():16. PubMed ID: 26457193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Very low-depth whole-genome sequencing in complex trait association studies.
Gilly A; Southam L; Suveges D; Kuchenbaecker K; Moore R; Melloni GEM; Hatzikotoulas K; Farmaki AE; Ritchie G; Schwartzentruber J; Danecek P; Kilian B; Pollard MO; Ge X; Tsafantakis E; Dedoussis G; Zeggini E
Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 35(15):2555-2561. PubMed ID: 30576415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing.
Edge P; Bansal V
Nat Commun; 2019 Oct; 10(1):4660. PubMed ID: 31604920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of whole genome sequencing from blood versus saliva derived DNA in cardiac patients.
Yao RA; Akinrinade O; Chaix M; Mital S
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Jan; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 31996208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From cytogenetics to cytogenomics: whole-genome sequencing as a first-line test comprehensively captures the diverse spectrum of disease-causing genetic variation underlying intellectual disability.
Lindstrand A; Eisfeldt J; Pettersson M; Carvalho CMB; Kvarnung M; Grigelioniene G; Anderlid BM; Bjerin O; Gustavsson P; Hammarsjö A; Georgii-Hemming P; Iwarsson E; Johansson-Soller M; Lagerstedt-Robinson K; Lieden A; Magnusson M; Martin M; Malmgren H; Nordenskjöld M; Norling A; Sahlin E; Stranneheim H; Tham E; Wincent J; Ygberg S; Wedell A; Wirta V; Nordgren A; Lundin J; Nilsson D
Genome Med; 2019 Nov; 11(1):68. PubMed ID: 31694722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Whole Genome Sequencing Data.
Hübschmann D; Schlesner M
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1956():321-336. PubMed ID: 30779042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data.
Fang H; Wu Y; Narzisi G; O'Rawe JA; Barrón LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Iossifov I; Schatz MC; Lyon GJ
Genome Med; 2014; 6(10):89. PubMed ID: 25426171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data.
Zhao S; Agafonov O; Azab A; Stokowy T; Hovig E
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20222. PubMed ID: 33214604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment.
Betschart RO; Thiéry A; Aguilera-Garcia D; Zoche M; Moch H; Twerenbold R; Zeller T; Blankenberg S; Ziegler A
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21502. PubMed ID: 36513709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.
Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variant calling in low-coverage whole genome sequencing of a Native American population sample.
Bizon C; Spiegel M; Chasse SA; Gizer IR; Li Y; Malc EP; Mieczkowski PA; Sailsbery JK; Wang X; Ehlers CL; Wilhelmsen KC
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():85. PubMed ID: 24479562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
