BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30742472)

  • 1. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computing Bayes factors from data with missing values.
    Hoijtink H; Gu X; Mulder J; Rosseel Y
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):253-268. PubMed ID: 29999379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.
    Pramanik S; Johnson VE
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):243-261. PubMed ID: 35420854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prior sensitivity of null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):804-821. PubMed ID: 34570555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A default Bayes factor for testing null hypotheses about the fixed effects of linear two-level models.
    Sekulovski N; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37104765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.
    Gu X; Mulder J; Hoijtink H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):229-261. PubMed ID: 28857129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research.
    Heck DW; Boehm U; Böing-Messing F; Bürkner PC; Derks K; Dienes Z; Fu Q; Gu X; Karimova D; Kiers HAL; Klugkist I; Kuiper RM; Lee MD; Leenders R; Leplaa HJ; Linde M; Ly A; Meijerink-Bosman M; Moerbeek M; Mulder J; Palfi B; Schönbrodt FD; Tendeiro JN; van den Bergh D; Van Lissa CJ; van Ravenzwaaij D; Vanpaemel W; Wagenmakers EJ; Williams DR; Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):558-579. PubMed ID: 35298215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses.
    Morey RD; Rouder JN
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):406-19. PubMed ID: 21787084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving Inferences About Null Effects With Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests.
    Lakens D; McLatchie N; Isager PM; Scheel AM; Dienes Z
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Jan; 75(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 29878211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials.
    Moerbeek M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30350025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses.
    Trafimow D
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2006 Nov; 132(4):431-62. PubMed ID: 18341235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample-size determination for the Bayesian t test and Welch's test using the approximate adjusted fractional Bayes factor.
    Fu Q; Hoijtink H; Moerbeek M
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):139-152. PubMed ID: 32632740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian hypothesis testing for single-subject designs.
    de Vries RM; Morey RD
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 23458719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why Bayesian Psychologists Should Change the Way They Use the Bayes Factor.
    Hoijtink H; van Kooten P; Hulsker K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26881951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests.
    Sanborn AN; Hills TT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Bayesian analysis. Basic and practical concepts for its interpretation and use].
    Rendón-Macías ME; Riojas-Garza A; Contreras-Estrada D; Martínez-Ezquerro JD
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2018; 65(3):285-298. PubMed ID: 30176207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian Analysis of Evidence in Support of the Null Hypothesis in Gerontological Psychology (or Lack Thereof).
    Brydges CR; Bielak AAM
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Jan; 75(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 30877301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deciding on Null Hypotheses using P-values or Bayesian alternatives: A simulation study.
    Ruiz-Ruano García AM; López Puga J
    Psicothema; 2018 Feb; 30(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 29363479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.